| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-Id: <20220110071813.184161884@linuxfoundation.org>
Date: Mon, 10 Jan 2022 08:22:58 +0100
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
stable@...r.kernel.org, Ian Abbott <abbotti@....co.uk>,
Michal Nazarewicz <mina86@...a86.com>,
Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Jakub Kicinski <jakub.kicinski@...ronome.com>,
Rasmus Villemoes <linux@...musvillemoes.dk>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Nathan Chancellor <nathan@...nel.org>
Subject: [PATCH 4.9 11/21] bug: split BUILD_BUG stuff out into <linux/build_bug.h>
From: Ian Abbott <abbotti@....co.uk>
commit bc6245e5efd70c41eaf9334b1b5e646745cb0fb3 upstream.
Including <linux/bug.h> pulls in a lot of bloat from <asm/bug.h> and
<asm-generic/bug.h> that is not needed to call the BUILD_BUG() family of
macros. Split them out into their own header, <linux/build_bug.h>.
Also correct some checkpatch.pl errors for the BUILD_BUG_ON_ZERO() and
BUILD_BUG_ON_NULL() macros by adding parentheses around the bitfield
widths that begin with a minus sign.
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20170525120316.24473-6-abbotti@mev.co.uk
Signed-off-by: Ian Abbott <abbotti@....co.uk>
Acked-by: Michal Nazarewicz <mina86@...a86.com>
Acked-by: Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>
Cc: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Cc: Jakub Kicinski <jakub.kicinski@...ronome.com>
Cc: Rasmus Villemoes <linux@...musvillemoes.dk>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
[nathan: Just take this patch, not the checkpatch.pl patches before it]
Signed-off-by: Nathan Chancellor <nathan@...nel.org>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
---
include/linux/bug.h | 72 ---------------------------------------
include/linux/build_bug.h | 84 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
2 files changed, 85 insertions(+), 71 deletions(-)
create mode 100644 include/linux/build_bug.h
--- a/include/linux/bug.h
+++ b/include/linux/bug.h
@@ -3,6 +3,7 @@
#include <asm/bug.h>
#include <linux/compiler.h>
+#include <linux/build_bug.h>
enum bug_trap_type {
BUG_TRAP_TYPE_NONE = 0,
@@ -13,80 +14,9 @@ enum bug_trap_type {
struct pt_regs;
#ifdef __CHECKER__
-#define __BUILD_BUG_ON_NOT_POWER_OF_2(n) (0)
-#define BUILD_BUG_ON_NOT_POWER_OF_2(n) (0)
-#define BUILD_BUG_ON_ZERO(e) (0)
-#define BUILD_BUG_ON_NULL(e) ((void*)0)
-#define BUILD_BUG_ON_INVALID(e) (0)
-#define BUILD_BUG_ON_MSG(cond, msg) (0)
-#define BUILD_BUG_ON(condition) (0)
-#define BUILD_BUG() (0)
#define MAYBE_BUILD_BUG_ON(cond) (0)
#else /* __CHECKER__ */
-/* Force a compilation error if a constant expression is not a power of 2 */
-#define __BUILD_BUG_ON_NOT_POWER_OF_2(n) \
- BUILD_BUG_ON(((n) & ((n) - 1)) != 0)
-#define BUILD_BUG_ON_NOT_POWER_OF_2(n) \
- BUILD_BUG_ON((n) == 0 || (((n) & ((n) - 1)) != 0))
-
-/* Force a compilation error if condition is true, but also produce a
- result (of value 0 and type size_t), so the expression can be used
- e.g. in a structure initializer (or where-ever else comma expressions
- aren't permitted). */
-#define BUILD_BUG_ON_ZERO(e) (sizeof(struct { int:-!!(e); }))
-#define BUILD_BUG_ON_NULL(e) ((void *)sizeof(struct { int:-!!(e); }))
-
-/*
- * BUILD_BUG_ON_INVALID() permits the compiler to check the validity of the
- * expression but avoids the generation of any code, even if that expression
- * has side-effects.
- */
-#define BUILD_BUG_ON_INVALID(e) ((void)(sizeof((__force long)(e))))
-
-/**
- * BUILD_BUG_ON_MSG - break compile if a condition is true & emit supplied
- * error message.
- * @condition: the condition which the compiler should know is false.
- *
- * See BUILD_BUG_ON for description.
- */
-#define BUILD_BUG_ON_MSG(cond, msg) compiletime_assert(!(cond), msg)
-
-/**
- * BUILD_BUG_ON - break compile if a condition is true.
- * @condition: the condition which the compiler should know is false.
- *
- * If you have some code which relies on certain constants being equal, or
- * some other compile-time-evaluated condition, you should use BUILD_BUG_ON to
- * detect if someone changes it.
- *
- * The implementation uses gcc's reluctance to create a negative array, but gcc
- * (as of 4.4) only emits that error for obvious cases (e.g. not arguments to
- * inline functions). Luckily, in 4.3 they added the "error" function
- * attribute just for this type of case. Thus, we use a negative sized array
- * (should always create an error on gcc versions older than 4.4) and then call
- * an undefined function with the error attribute (should always create an
- * error on gcc 4.3 and later). If for some reason, neither creates a
- * compile-time error, we'll still have a link-time error, which is harder to
- * track down.
- */
-#ifndef __OPTIMIZE__
-#define BUILD_BUG_ON(condition) ((void)sizeof(char[1 - 2*!!(condition)]))
-#else
-#define BUILD_BUG_ON(condition) \
- BUILD_BUG_ON_MSG(condition, "BUILD_BUG_ON failed: " #condition)
-#endif
-
-/**
- * BUILD_BUG - break compile if used.
- *
- * If you have some code that you expect the compiler to eliminate at
- * build time, you should use BUILD_BUG to detect if it is
- * unexpectedly used.
- */
-#define BUILD_BUG() BUILD_BUG_ON_MSG(1, "BUILD_BUG failed")
-
#define MAYBE_BUILD_BUG_ON(cond) \
do { \
if (__builtin_constant_p((cond))) \
--- /dev/null
+++ b/include/linux/build_bug.h
@@ -0,0 +1,84 @@
+#ifndef _LINUX_BUILD_BUG_H
+#define _LINUX_BUILD_BUG_H
+
+#include <linux/compiler.h>
+
+#ifdef __CHECKER__
+#define __BUILD_BUG_ON_NOT_POWER_OF_2(n) (0)
+#define BUILD_BUG_ON_NOT_POWER_OF_2(n) (0)
+#define BUILD_BUG_ON_ZERO(e) (0)
+#define BUILD_BUG_ON_NULL(e) ((void *)0)
+#define BUILD_BUG_ON_INVALID(e) (0)
+#define BUILD_BUG_ON_MSG(cond, msg) (0)
+#define BUILD_BUG_ON(condition) (0)
+#define BUILD_BUG() (0)
+#else /* __CHECKER__ */
+
+/* Force a compilation error if a constant expression is not a power of 2 */
+#define __BUILD_BUG_ON_NOT_POWER_OF_2(n) \
+ BUILD_BUG_ON(((n) & ((n) - 1)) != 0)
+#define BUILD_BUG_ON_NOT_POWER_OF_2(n) \
+ BUILD_BUG_ON((n) == 0 || (((n) & ((n) - 1)) != 0))
+
+/*
+ * Force a compilation error if condition is true, but also produce a
+ * result (of value 0 and type size_t), so the expression can be used
+ * e.g. in a structure initializer (or where-ever else comma expressions
+ * aren't permitted).
+ */
+#define BUILD_BUG_ON_ZERO(e) (sizeof(struct { int:(-!!(e)); }))
+#define BUILD_BUG_ON_NULL(e) ((void *)sizeof(struct { int:(-!!(e)); }))
+
+/*
+ * BUILD_BUG_ON_INVALID() permits the compiler to check the validity of the
+ * expression but avoids the generation of any code, even if that expression
+ * has side-effects.
+ */
+#define BUILD_BUG_ON_INVALID(e) ((void)(sizeof((__force long)(e))))
+
+/**
+ * BUILD_BUG_ON_MSG - break compile if a condition is true & emit supplied
+ * error message.
+ * @condition: the condition which the compiler should know is false.
+ *
+ * See BUILD_BUG_ON for description.
+ */
+#define BUILD_BUG_ON_MSG(cond, msg) compiletime_assert(!(cond), msg)
+
+/**
+ * BUILD_BUG_ON - break compile if a condition is true.
+ * @condition: the condition which the compiler should know is false.
+ *
+ * If you have some code which relies on certain constants being equal, or
+ * some other compile-time-evaluated condition, you should use BUILD_BUG_ON to
+ * detect if someone changes it.
+ *
+ * The implementation uses gcc's reluctance to create a negative array, but gcc
+ * (as of 4.4) only emits that error for obvious cases (e.g. not arguments to
+ * inline functions). Luckily, in 4.3 they added the "error" function
+ * attribute just for this type of case. Thus, we use a negative sized array
+ * (should always create an error on gcc versions older than 4.4) and then call
+ * an undefined function with the error attribute (should always create an
+ * error on gcc 4.3 and later). If for some reason, neither creates a
+ * compile-time error, we'll still have a link-time error, which is harder to
+ * track down.
+ */
+#ifndef __OPTIMIZE__
+#define BUILD_BUG_ON(condition) ((void)sizeof(char[1 - 2*!!(condition)]))
+#else
+#define BUILD_BUG_ON(condition) \
+ BUILD_BUG_ON_MSG(condition, "BUILD_BUG_ON failed: " #condition)
+#endif
+
+/**
+ * BUILD_BUG - break compile if used.
+ *
+ * If you have some code that you expect the compiler to eliminate at
+ * build time, you should use BUILD_BUG to detect if it is
+ * unexpectedly used.
+ */
+#define BUILD_BUG() BUILD_BUG_ON_MSG(1, "BUILD_BUG failed")
+
+#endif /* __CHECKER__ */
+
+#endif /* _LINUX_BUILD_BUG_H */
Powered by blists - more mailing lists