[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20220110071815.802408688@linuxfoundation.org>
Date: Mon, 10 Jan 2022 08:22:59 +0100
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
stable@...r.kernel.org,
"Naveen N. Rao" <naveen.n.rao@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
Subject: [PATCH 5.4 04/34] tracing: Fix check for trace_percpu_buffer validity in get_trace_buf()
From: Naveen N. Rao <naveen.n.rao@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
commit 823e670f7ed616d0ce993075c8afe0217885f79d upstream.
With the new osnoise tracer, we are seeing the below splat:
Kernel attempted to read user page (c7d880000) - exploit attempt? (uid: 0)
BUG: Unable to handle kernel data access on read at 0xc7d880000
Faulting instruction address: 0xc0000000002ffa10
Oops: Kernel access of bad area, sig: 11 [#1]
LE PAGE_SIZE=64K MMU=Radix SMP NR_CPUS=2048 NUMA pSeries
...
NIP [c0000000002ffa10] __trace_array_vprintk.part.0+0x70/0x2f0
LR [c0000000002ff9fc] __trace_array_vprintk.part.0+0x5c/0x2f0
Call Trace:
[c0000008bdd73b80] [c0000000001c49cc] put_prev_task_fair+0x3c/0x60 (unreliable)
[c0000008bdd73be0] [c000000000301430] trace_array_printk_buf+0x70/0x90
[c0000008bdd73c00] [c0000000003178b0] trace_sched_switch_callback+0x250/0x290
[c0000008bdd73c90] [c000000000e70d60] __schedule+0x410/0x710
[c0000008bdd73d40] [c000000000e710c0] schedule+0x60/0x130
[c0000008bdd73d70] [c000000000030614] interrupt_exit_user_prepare_main+0x264/0x270
[c0000008bdd73de0] [c000000000030a70] syscall_exit_prepare+0x150/0x180
[c0000008bdd73e10] [c00000000000c174] system_call_vectored_common+0xf4/0x278
osnoise tracer on ppc64le is triggering osnoise_taint() for negative
duration in get_int_safe_duration() called from
trace_sched_switch_callback()->thread_exit().
The problem though is that the check for a valid trace_percpu_buffer is
incorrect in get_trace_buf(). The check is being done after calculating
the pointer for the current cpu, rather than on the main percpu pointer.
Fix the check to be against trace_percpu_buffer.
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/a920e4272e0b0635cf20c444707cbce1b2c8973d.1640255304.git.naveen.n.rao@linux.vnet.ibm.com
Cc: stable@...r.kernel.org
Fixes: e2ace001176dc9 ("tracing: Choose static tp_printk buffer by explicit nesting count")
Signed-off-by: Naveen N. Rao <naveen.n.rao@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
---
kernel/trace/trace.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
--- a/kernel/trace/trace.c
+++ b/kernel/trace/trace.c
@@ -3017,7 +3017,7 @@ static char *get_trace_buf(void)
{
struct trace_buffer_struct *buffer = this_cpu_ptr(trace_percpu_buffer);
- if (!buffer || buffer->nesting >= 4)
+ if (!trace_percpu_buffer || buffer->nesting >= 4)
return NULL;
buffer->nesting++;
Powered by blists - more mailing lists