[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <7a6eef24-66eb-297d-8bc2-2170692018f9@kernel.org>
Date: Mon, 10 Jan 2022 09:23:15 +0100
From: Jiri Slaby <jirislaby@...nel.org>
To: Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@...il.com>,
"tcs.kernel@...il.com" <tcs.kernel@...il.com>
Cc: "gregkh@...uxfoundation.org" <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"syzbot+b68d24ad0de64bdba684@...kaller.appspotmail.com"
<syzbot+b68d24ad0de64bdba684@...kaller.appspotmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] tty tty_buffer: fix uninit-value in
n_tty_receive_buf_common
On 08. 01. 22, 0:24, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
>
>
> On Friday, January 7, 2022, <tcs.kernel@...il.com
> <mailto:tcs.kernel@...il.com>> wrote:
>
> From: Haimin Zhang <tcs.kernel@...il.com <mailto:tcs.kernel@...il.com>>
>
> syzbot report an uninit-value issue in n_tty_receive_buf_common.
> The root case is in the tty_buffer_reset() which in tty_buffer_alloc()
> function, it initialized the tty_buffer struct but did not initialize
> "data[]" points area. So we should initialize the points area to avoid
> using dirty data.
> The syzbot report is as follows:
>
> BUG: KMSAN: uninit-value in variable_test_bit
> arch/x86/include/asm/bitops.h:214 [inline]
> BUG: KMSAN: uninit-value in test_bit
> include/asm-generic/bitops/instrumented-non-atomic.h:135 [inline]
> BUG: KMSAN: uninit-value in n_tty_receive_buf_standard
> drivers/tty/n_tty.c:1557 [inline]
> BUG: KMSAN: uninit-value in __receive_buf drivers/tty/n_tty.c:1577
> [inline]
> BUG: KMSAN: uninit-value in n_tty_receive_buf_common+0x1e6c/0x10360
> drivers/tty/n_tty.c:1674
> variable_test_bit arch/x86/include/asm/bitops.h:214 [inline]
> test_bit include/asm-generic/bitops/instrumented-non-atomic.h:135
> [inline]
> n_tty_receive_buf_standard drivers/tty/n_tty.c:1557 [inline]
> __receive_buf drivers/tty/n_tty.c:1577 [inline]
> n_tty_receive_buf_common+0x1e6c/0x10360 drivers/tty/n_tty.c:1674
> n_tty_receive_buf2+0xbe/0xd0 drivers/tty/n_tty.c:1709
> tty_ldisc_receive_buf+0x15e/0x390 drivers/tty/tty_buffer.c:471
> tty_port_default_receive_buf+0x14b/0x1e0 drivers/tty/tty_port.c:39
> receive_buf drivers/tty/tty_buffer.c:491 [inline]
> flush_to_ldisc+0x5bf/0xa10 drivers/tty/tty_buffer.c:543
> process_one_work+0xdc2/0x1820 kernel/workqueue.c:2298
> worker_thread+0x10f1/0x2290 kernel/workqueue.c:2445
> kthread+0x721/0x850 kernel/kthread.c:327
> ret_from_fork+0x1f/0x30
>
> Uninit was created at:
> slab_post_alloc_hook mm/slab.h:524 [inline]
> slab_alloc_node mm/slub.c:3251 [inline]
> slab_alloc mm/slub.c:3259 [inline]
> __kmalloc+0xc3c/0x12d0 mm/slub.c:4437
> kmalloc include/linux/slab.h:595 [inline]
> tty_buffer_alloc drivers/tty/tty_buffer.c:177 [inline]
> __tty_buffer_request_room+0x4d2/0x900 drivers/tty/tty_buffer.c:275
> __tty_insert_flip_char+0xe5/0x3d0 drivers/tty/tty_buffer.c:392
> tty_insert_flip_char include/linux/tty_flip.h:36 [inline]
> uart_insert_char+0x495/0xb70 drivers/tty/serial/serial_core.c:3139
> serial8250_read_char+0x280/0x820
> drivers/tty/serial/8250/8250_port.c:1769
> serial8250_rx_chars drivers/tty/serial/8250/8250_port.c:1784 [inline]
> serial8250_handle_irq+0x540/0x980
> drivers/tty/serial/8250/8250_port.c:1927
> serial8250_default_handle_irq+0x18f/0x370
> drivers/tty/serial/8250/8250_port.c:1949
> serial8250_interrupt+0x111/0x3f0
> drivers/tty/serial/8250/8250_core.c:126
> __handle_irq_event_percpu+0x188/0xc90 kernel/irq/handle.c:158
> handle_irq_event_percpu kernel/irq/handle.c:198 [inline]
> handle_irq_event+0x188/0x420 kernel/irq/handle.c:215
> handle_edge_irq+0x472/0x13e0 kernel/irq/chip.c:822
> generic_handle_irq_desc include/linux/irqdesc.h:158 [inline]
> handle_irq arch/x86/kernel/irq.c:231 [inline]
> __common_interrupt+0xf8/0x360 arch/x86/kernel/irq.c:250
> common_interrupt+0xb1/0xd0 arch/x86/kernel/irq.c:240
> asm_common_interrupt+0x1e/0x40
>
>
> It’s rather long and noisy trace back, can you decrease it to the point,
> please?
>
> Reported-by: syzbot+b68d24ad0de64bdba684@...kaller.appspotmail.com
> <mailto:syzbot+b68d24ad0de64bdba684@...kaller.appspotmail.com>
> Signed-off-by: Haimin Zhang <tcs.kernel@...il.com
> <mailto:tcs.kernel@...il.com>>
> ---
> drivers/tty/tty_buffer.c | 1 +
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/tty/tty_buffer.c b/drivers/tty/tty_buffer.c
> index 6c7e65b1d9a1..0e7f3547d971 100644
> --- a/drivers/tty/tty_buffer.c
> +++ b/drivers/tty/tty_buffer.c
> @@ -180,6 +180,7 @@ static struct tty_buffer
> *tty_buffer_alloc(struct tty_port *port, size_t size)
>
> found:
> tty_buffer_reset(p, size);
> + memset((char *)p + sizeof(struct tty_buffer), 0, 2 * size);
>
>
> I’m wondering if you may use offsetof() or other suitable macro instead
> of this cryptic pointer arithmetic.
That memset was one of the WTFs. Why not simply p->data?
Anyway, it remains to explain why something touches the data, when the
metadata are properly reset?
thanks,
--
js
suse labs
Powered by blists - more mailing lists