[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAEVVKH-oUtcmXutS4jQa06ZX4q8S7dKaTmvFzHWyUFgB-agbew@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 10 Jan 2022 17:30:12 +0800
From: Xiongwei Song <sxwjean@...il.com>
To: David Hildenbrand <david@...hat.com>
Cc: Xiongwei Song <sxwjean@...com>, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
mhocko@...e.com, dan.j.williams@...el.com, osalvador@...e.de,
naoya.horiguchi@....com, thunder.leizhen@...wei.com,
linux-mm@...ck.org, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] mm/memremap.c: Add pfn_to_devmap_page() to get page
in ZONE_DEVICE
Hi David,
On Mon, Jan 10, 2022 at 4:16 PM David Hildenbrand <david@...hat.com> wrote:
>
> On 09.01.22 14:05, sxwjean@...com wrote:
> > From: Xiongwei Song <sxwjean@...il.com>
> >
> > when requesting page information by /proc/kpage*, the pages in ZONE_DEVICE
> > were missed. We need a function to help on this.
> >
> > The pfn_to_devmap_page() function like pfn_to_online_page(), but only
> > concerns the pages in ZONE_DEVICE.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Xiongwei Song <sxwjean@...il.com>
> > ---
> > include/linux/memremap.h | 8 ++++++++
> > mm/memremap.c | 42 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> > 2 files changed, 50 insertions(+)
> >
> > diff --git a/include/linux/memremap.h b/include/linux/memremap.h
> > index c0e9d35889e8..621723e9c4a5 100644
> > --- a/include/linux/memremap.h
> > +++ b/include/linux/memremap.h
> > @@ -137,6 +137,8 @@ void *devm_memremap_pages(struct device *dev, struct dev_pagemap *pgmap);
> > void devm_memunmap_pages(struct device *dev, struct dev_pagemap *pgmap);
> > struct dev_pagemap *get_dev_pagemap(unsigned long pfn,
> > struct dev_pagemap *pgmap);
> > +struct page *pfn_to_devmap_page(unsigned long pfn,
> > + struct dev_pagemap **pgmap);
> > bool pgmap_pfn_valid(struct dev_pagemap *pgmap, unsigned long pfn);
> >
> > unsigned long vmem_altmap_offset(struct vmem_altmap *altmap);
> > @@ -166,6 +168,12 @@ static inline struct dev_pagemap *get_dev_pagemap(unsigned long pfn,
> > return NULL;
> > }
> >
> > +static inline struct page *pfn_to_devmap_page(unsigned long pfn,
> > + struct dev_pagemap **pgmap)
> > +{
> > + return NULL;
> > +}
> > +
> > static inline bool pgmap_pfn_valid(struct dev_pagemap *pgmap, unsigned long pfn)
> > {
> > return false;
> > diff --git a/mm/memremap.c b/mm/memremap.c
> > index 5a66a71ab591..072dbe6ab81c 100644
> > --- a/mm/memremap.c
> > +++ b/mm/memremap.c
> > @@ -494,6 +494,48 @@ struct dev_pagemap *get_dev_pagemap(unsigned long pfn,
> > }
> > EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(get_dev_pagemap);
> >
> > +/**
> > + * pfn_to_devmap_page - get page pointer which belongs to dev_pagemap by @pfn
> > + * @pfn: page frame number to lookup page_map
> > + * @pgmap: to save pgmap address which is for putting reference
> > + *
> > + * If @pgmap is non-NULL, then pfn is on ZONE_DEVICE and return page pointer.
> > + */
> > +struct page *pfn_to_devmap_page(unsigned long pfn, struct dev_pagemap **pgmap)
> > +{
> > + unsigned long nr = pfn_to_section_nr(pfn);
> > + struct mem_section *ms;
> > + struct page *page = NULL;
> > +
> > + if (nr >= NR_MEM_SECTIONS)
> > + return NULL;
> > +
> > + if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_HAVE_ARCH_PFN_VALID) && !pfn_valid(pfn))
> > + return NULL;
> > +
> > + ms = __nr_to_section(nr);
> > + if (!valid_section(ms))
> > + return NULL;
> > + if (!pfn_section_valid(ms, pfn))
> > + return NULL;
> > +
> > + /*
> > + * Two types of sections may include valid pfns:
> > + * - The pfns of section belong to ZONE_DEVICE and ZONE_{NORMAL,MOVABLE}
> > + * at the same time.
> > + * - All pfns in one section are offline but valid.
> > + */
> > + if (!online_device_section(ms) && online_section(ms))
> > + return NULL;
> > +
> > + *pgmap = get_dev_pagemap(pfn, NULL);
> > + if (*pgmap)
> > + page = pfn_to_page(pfn);
> > +
> > + return page;
> > +}
> > +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(pfn_to_devmap_page);
>
> Is this complexity really required?
>
> Take a look at mm/memory-failure.c
>
> p = pfn_to_online_page(pfn);
> if (!p) {
> if (pfn_valid(pfn)) {
> pgmap = get_dev_pagemap(pfn, NULL);
> if (pgmap)
> // success
> // error
> }
> // error
> }
Yes, this method is much simpler than mine. Will do this in v2.
>
>
> Also, why do we need the export?
Ah, no strong reason. Will remove that in v2.
Would you mind adding "Suggested-by" for this patch?
Thank you for your time.
Regards,
Xiongwei
Powered by blists - more mailing lists