[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Ydugwh5IW+1JYsnE@piliu.users.ipa.redhat.com>
Date: Mon, 10 Jan 2022 10:58:10 +0800
From: Pingfan Liu <kernelfans@...il.com>
To: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] tracing/filter: degrade addr in filter_pred_string()
from double pointer to pointer
On Fri, Jan 07, 2022 at 12:18:42PM -0500, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> On Fri, 7 Jan 2022 12:49:49 +0800
> Pingfan Liu <kernelfans@...il.com> wrote:
>
> > Since FILTER_PTR_STRING has the type of "char *", it is meaningless to
> > convert it to "char **". Hence degrading addr from double pointer to
> > single.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Pingfan Liu <kernelfans@...il.com>
> > Cc: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
> > Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>
> > To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
> > ---
> > kernel/trace/trace_events_filter.c | 6 +++---
> > 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/kernel/trace/trace_events_filter.c b/kernel/trace/trace_events_filter.c
> > index c9124038b140..264456e1698f 100644
> > --- a/kernel/trace/trace_events_filter.c
> > +++ b/kernel/trace/trace_events_filter.c
> > @@ -670,11 +670,11 @@ static int filter_pred_string(struct filter_pred *pred, void *event)
> > /* Filter predicate for char * pointers */
> > static int filter_pred_pchar(struct filter_pred *pred, void *event)
> > {
> > - char **addr = (char **)(event + pred->offset);
> > + char *addr = (char *)(event + pred->offset);
>
> This doesn't look right. The address of the pointer should be in the event.
> "event" is an address to the content of the event in the kernel ring buffer.
>
> event + pred->offset
>
> Is then the address of position of the event.
>
> Let's say we have an event record at 0xffff8000, and the pred->offset is at
> 0x10. And the pointer to the string (in user space) is at 0x70008000.
>
> 0xffff8000: <heade>
> 0xffff8010: 0x70008000
>
> 0x70008000: "user space sting"
>
> event + pred->offset gives us 0xffff8010
>
> If we now have that as char *addr, then addr is 0xffff8010
>
>
> > int cmp, match;
> > - int len = strlen(*addr) + 1; /* including tailing '\0' */
> > + int len = strlen(addr) + 1; /* including tailing '\0' */
>
> This would give us the addr = 0xffff8010, which is not where the string
> exists.
>
> How would this work?
>
No, it can not work.
Thanks,
Pingfan
Powered by blists - more mailing lists