[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Ydw1MOcmS6fZ6J8d@lunn.ch>
Date: Mon, 10 Jan 2022 14:31:28 +0100
From: Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>
To: Conley Lee <conleylee@...mail.com>
Cc: davem@...emloft.net, kuba@...nel.org, mripard@...nel.org,
wens@...e.org, clabbe.montjoie@...il.com, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] net: ethernet: sun4i-emac: replace magic number with
macro
> @@ -637,7 +637,9 @@ static void emac_rx(struct net_device *dev)
> if (!rxcount) {
> db->emacrx_completed_flag = 1;
> reg_val = readl(db->membase + EMAC_INT_CTL_REG);
> - reg_val |= (0xf << 0) | (0x01 << 8);
> + reg_val |=
> + (EMAC_INT_CTL_TX_EN | EMAC_INT_CTL_TX_ABRT_EN |
> + EMAC_INT_CTL_RX_EN);
Putting the first value on the next line is a bit odd. This would be
preferred:
+ reg_val |= (EMAC_INT_CTL_TX_EN |
+ EMAC_INT_CTL_TX_ABRT_EN |
+ EMAC_INT_CTL_RX_EN);
I also have to wonder why two | have become three? (0x01 << 8) is
clearly a single value. (0xf << 0) should either be a single macro, or
4 macros since 0xf is four bits. Without looking into the details, i
cannot say this is wrong, but it does look strange.
Andrew
Powered by blists - more mailing lists