[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <baa991a5-31d8-80fb-faf0-b443626030d4@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 10 Jan 2022 19:18:58 -0500
From: Jesse Taube <mr.bossman075@...il.com>
To: Abel Vesa <abel.vesa@....com>, Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...nel.org>
Cc: linux-imx@....com, mturquette@...libre.com, robh+dt@...nel.org,
shawnguo@...nel.org, s.hauer@...gutronix.de, kernel@...gutronix.de,
festevam@...il.com, ulf.hansson@...aro.org, aisheng.dong@....com,
stefan@...er.ch, linus.walleij@...aro.org,
gregkh@...uxfoundation.org, arnd@...db.de, olof@...om.net,
soc@...nel.org, linux@...linux.org.uk, adrian.hunter@...el.com,
jirislaby@...nel.org, giulio.benetti@...ettiengineering.com,
nobuhiro1.iwamatsu@...hiba.co.jp, linux-clk@...r.kernel.org,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-mmc@...r.kernel.org,
linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org, linux-serial@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 5/7] clk: imx: Add initial support for i.MXRT1050 clock
driver
On 1/10/22 17:48, Abel Vesa wrote:
> On 22-01-10 12:12:00, Stephen Boyd wrote:
>> Quoting Jesse Taube (2022-01-09 11:07:42)
>>>>> +
>>>>> + clk_hw_data->num = IMXRT1050_CLK_END;
>>>>> + hws = clk_hw_data->hws;
>>>>> +
>>>>> + hws[IMXRT1050_CLK_OSC] = __clk_get_hw(of_clk_get_by_name(np, "osc"));
>>>>
>>>> Use clk_parent_data instead and reference the binding name with .fw_name
>>>
>>> Hi Stephen, sorry to bother you again.
>>> I'm wondering if adding `clk_parent_data` is necessary as it seems like
>>> it wold be a big change and the other IMX boards haven't implemented
>>> this yet would it be okay if I don't do this, or if it is necessary
>>> could you link to a patch set to change it.
>>>
>>
>> Is it a big change because the imx_clk_hw*() APIs aren't prepared for
>> non-string parents? Can you make some clk_parent_data based APIs and
>> migrate things over gradually? This is really a question for i.MX folks
>> to see if anyone is working on moving away from the string names.
>
> I'm currently looking into it. I would suggest we take this patch as is
> and I'll switch it later on to clk_parent_data.
Thanks so much that would be great!
Should I sent the other changes requested I have them ready? Or should i
wait.
Best regards
Jesse Taube
Powered by blists - more mailing lists