[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <YdzqlzjpDILjumRy@iki.fi>
Date: Tue, 11 Jan 2022 04:25:27 +0200
From: Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko@...nel.org>
To: Nayna <nayna@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: Nayna Jain <nayna@...ux.ibm.com>, linux-integrity@...r.kernel.org,
keyrings@...r.kernel.org, dhowells@...hat.com, zohar@...ux.ibm.com,
linux-security-module@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, dimitri.ledkov@...onical.com,
seth@...shee.me, kernel test robot <lkp@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 1/3] certs: export load_certificate_list() to be used
outside certs/
On Tue, Jan 11, 2022 at 04:25:09AM +0200, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 10, 2022 at 11:12:41AM -0500, Nayna wrote:
> >
> > On 1/8/22 08:54, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote:
> > > On Wed, Jan 05, 2022 at 12:54:08PM -0500, Nayna Jain wrote:
> > > > load_certificate_list() parses certificates embedded in the kernel
> > > > image to load them onto the keyring.
> > > >
> > > > Commit "2565ca7f5ec1 (certs: Move load_system_certificate_list to a common
> > > > function)" made load_certificate_list() a common function in the certs/
> > > > directory. Now, export load_certificate_list() outside certs/ to be used
> > > > by load_platform_certificate_list() which is added later in the patchset.
> > > >
> > > > Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@...el.com> (auto build test ERROR)
> > > > Reviewed-by: Mimi Zohar <zohar@...ux.ibm.com>
> > > > Signed-off-by: Nayna Jain <nayna@...ux.ibm.com>
> > > This lacking fixes tag, if it is a bug, or "reported-by" needs to be
> > > completely removed.
> >
> > When I posted my first version for this patch set, kernel test robot
> > reported the build error -
> > https://lore.kernel.org/linux-integrity/202109110507.ucpEmrwz-lkp@intel.com/
> >
> > The Reported-by tag is because of this statement in the reported error - "
> > If you fix the issue, kindly add following tag as appropriate Reported-by:
> > kernel test robot <lkp@...el.com>"
> >
> > Do you still think that the tag is not required ? If so, I am fine to remove
> > it.
>
> It makes absolutely no sense for anything that is not triggered by the
> mainline code.
I.e. if it is not merged, there is no bug.
/Jarkko
Powered by blists - more mailing lists