[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20220111203356.cnzpo4uyhnybm5cp@pengutronix.de>
Date: Tue, 11 Jan 2022 21:33:56 +0100
From: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@...gutronix.de>
To: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...cle.com>
Cc: William Breathitt Gray <vilhelm.gray@...il.com>,
Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@...wei.com>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
linux-iio@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] counter: fix an IS_ERR() vs NULL bug
On Tue, Jan 11, 2022 at 08:32:43PM +0300, Dan Carpenter wrote:
> There are 8 callers for devm_counter_alloc() and they all check for NULL
> instead of error pointers. I think NULL is the better thing to return
> for allocation functions so update counter_alloc() and devm_counter_alloc()
> to return NULL instead of error pointers.
>
> Fixes: c18e2760308e ("counter: Provide alternative counter registration functions")
> Signed-off-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...cle.com>
Acked-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@...gutronix.de>
Thanks
Uwe
--
Pengutronix e.K. | Uwe Kleine-König |
Industrial Linux Solutions | https://www.pengutronix.de/ |
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (489 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists