[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20220111030626.GA2175@gao-cwp>
Date: Tue, 11 Jan 2022 11:06:28 +0800
From: Chao Gao <chao.gao@...el.com>
To: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@...gle.com>
Cc: kvm@...r.kernel.org, pbonzini@...hat.com, kevin.tian@...el.com,
tglx@...utronix.de, Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@...hat.com>,
Wanpeng Li <wanpengli@...cent.com>,
Jim Mattson <jmattson@...gle.com>,
Joerg Roedel <joro@...tes.org>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>, x86@...nel.org,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/6] KVM: x86: Use kvm_x86_ops in
kvm_arch_check_processor_compat
On Mon, Jan 10, 2022 at 09:10:10PM +0000, Sean Christopherson wrote:
>On Mon, Dec 27, 2021, Chao Gao wrote:
>> check_processor_compatibility() is a "runtime" ops now. Use
>> kvm_x86_ops directly such that kvm_arch_check_processor_compat
>> can be called at runtime.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Chao Gao <chao.gao@...el.com>
>> ---
>> arch/x86/kvm/x86.c | 3 +--
>> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c b/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
>> index 6411417b6871..770b68e72391 100644
>> --- a/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
>> +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
>> @@ -11383,7 +11383,6 @@ void kvm_arch_hardware_unsetup(void)
>> int kvm_arch_check_processor_compat(void *opaque)
>> {
>> struct cpuinfo_x86 *c = &cpu_data(smp_processor_id());
>> - struct kvm_x86_init_ops *ops = opaque;
>>
>> WARN_ON(!irqs_disabled());
>>
>> @@ -11391,7 +11390,7 @@ int kvm_arch_check_processor_compat(void *opaque)
>> __cr4_reserved_bits(cpu_has, &boot_cpu_data))
>> return -EIO;
>>
>> - return ops->runtime_ops->check_processor_compatibility();
>> + return kvm_x86_ops.check_processor_compatibility();
>
>I'd just squash this with patch 01. And might as well make this a static_call().
Will do
Powered by blists - more mailing lists