lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Tue, 11 Jan 2022 11:33:22 +0800 From: "Peng Fan (OSS)" <peng.fan@....nxp.com> To: bjorn.andersson@...aro.org, mathieu.poirier@...aro.org, shawnguo@...nel.org, s.hauer@...gutronix.de, kernel@...gutronix.de, festevam@...il.com, linux-imx@....com, linux-remoteproc@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org Cc: Peng Fan <peng.fan@....com> Subject: [PATCH V2] remoteproc: imx_rproc: use imx specific hook for find_loaded_rsc_table From: Peng Fan <peng.fan@....com> If there is a resource table device tree node, use the address as the resource table address, otherwise use the address(where .resource_table section loaded) inside the Cortex-M elf file. And there is an update in NXP SDK that Resource Domain Control(RDC) enabled to protect TCM, linux not able to write the TCM space when updating resource table status and cause kernel dump. So use the address from device tree could avoid kernel dump. Note: NXP M4 SDK not check resource table update, so it does not matter use whether resource table address specified in elf file or in device tree. But to reflect the fact that if people specific resource table address in device tree, it means people are aware and going to use it, not the address specified in elf file. Signed-off-by: Peng Fan <peng.fan@....com> --- V2: Update commit message drivers/remoteproc/imx_rproc.c | 13 ++++++++++++- 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/drivers/remoteproc/imx_rproc.c b/drivers/remoteproc/imx_rproc.c index 7a096f1891e6..0bd24c937a73 100644 --- a/drivers/remoteproc/imx_rproc.c +++ b/drivers/remoteproc/imx_rproc.c @@ -499,6 +499,17 @@ static struct resource_table *imx_rproc_get_loaded_rsc_table(struct rproc *rproc return (struct resource_table *)priv->rsc_table; } +static struct resource_table * +imx_rproc_elf_find_loaded_rsc_table(struct rproc *rproc, const struct firmware *fw) +{ + struct imx_rproc *priv = rproc->priv; + + if (priv->rsc_table) + return (struct resource_table *)priv->rsc_table; + + return rproc_elf_find_loaded_rsc_table(rproc, fw); +} + static const struct rproc_ops imx_rproc_ops = { .prepare = imx_rproc_prepare, .attach = imx_rproc_attach, @@ -508,7 +519,7 @@ static const struct rproc_ops imx_rproc_ops = { .da_to_va = imx_rproc_da_to_va, .load = rproc_elf_load_segments, .parse_fw = imx_rproc_parse_fw, - .find_loaded_rsc_table = rproc_elf_find_loaded_rsc_table, + .find_loaded_rsc_table = imx_rproc_elf_find_loaded_rsc_table, .get_loaded_rsc_table = imx_rproc_get_loaded_rsc_table, .sanity_check = rproc_elf_sanity_check, .get_boot_addr = rproc_elf_get_boot_addr, -- 2.25.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists