[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Yd1Css8+jsspeZHh@google.com>
Date: Tue, 11 Jan 2022 01:41:22 -0700
From: Yu Zhao <yuzhao@...gle.com>
To: Alexandre Frade <kernel@...mod.org>,
Brian Geffon <bgeffon@...gle.com>,
Daniel Byrne <djbyrne@....edu>,
Holger Hoffstätte
<holger@...lied-asynchrony.com>,
Jan Alexander Steffens <heftig@...hlinux.org>,
Shuang Zhai <szhai2@...rochester.edu>,
Sofia Trinh <sofia.trinh@....works>,
Steven Barrett <steven@...uorix.net>,
Suleiman Souhlal <suleiman@...gle.com>
Cc: Andi Kleen <ak@...ux.intel.com>,
Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>,
Hillf Danton <hdanton@...a.com>, Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>,
Jesse Barnes <jsbarnes@...gle.com>,
Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>,
Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>,
Matthew Wilcox <willy@...radead.org>,
Mel Gorman <mgorman@...e.de>,
Michael Larabel <Michael@...haellarabel.com>,
Michal Hocko <mhocko@...nel.org>,
Rik van Riel <riel@...riel.com>,
Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@...e.cz>,
Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>,
Ying Huang <ying.huang@...el.com>,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-doc@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org,
page-reclaim@...gle.com, x86@...nel.org,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 0/9] Multigenerational LRU Framework
On Tue, Jan 04, 2022 at 01:30:00PM -0700, Yu Zhao wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 04, 2022 at 01:22:19PM -0700, Yu Zhao wrote:
> > TLDR
> > ====
> > The current page reclaim is too expensive in terms of CPU usage and it
> > often makes poor choices about what to evict. This patchset offers an
> > alternative solution that is performant, versatile and
> > straightforward.
>
> <snipped>
>
> > Summery
> > =======
> > The facts are:
> > 1. The independent lab results and the real-world applications
> > indicate substantial improvements; there are no known regressions.
> > 2. Thrashing prevention, working set estimation and proactive reclaim
> > work out of the box; there are no equivalent solutions.
> > 3. There is a lot of new code; nobody has demonstrated smaller changes
> > with similar effects.
> >
> > Our options, accordingly, are:
> > 1. Given the amount of evidence, the reported improvements will likely
> > materialize for a wide range of workloads.
> > 2. Gauging the interest from the past discussions [14][15][16], the
> > new features will likely be put to use for both personal computers
> > and data centers.
> > 3. Based on Google's track record, the new code will likely be well
> > maintained in the long term. It'd be more difficult if not
> > impossible to achieve similar effects on top of the existing
> > design.
>
> Hi Andrew, Linus,
>
> Can you please take a look at this patchset and let me know if it's
> 5.17 material?
>
> My goal is to get it merged asap so that users can reap the benefits
> and I can push the sequels. Please examine the data provided -- I
> think the unprecedented coverage and the magnitude of the improvements
> warrant a green light.
Downstream kernel maintainers who have been carrying MGLRU for more than
3 versions, can you please provide your Acked-by tags?
Having this patchset in the mainline will make your job easier :)
Alexandre - the XanMod Kernel maintainer
https://xanmod.org
Brian - the Chrome OS kernel memory maintainer
https://www.chromium.org
Jan - the Arch Linux Zen kernel maintainer
https://archlinux.org
Steven - the Liquorix kernel maintainer
https://liquorix.net
Suleiman - the ARCVM (Android downstream) kernel memory maintainer
https://chromium.googlesource.com/chromiumos/third_party/kernel
Also my gratitude to those who have helped test MGLRU:
Daniel - researcher at Michigan Tech
benchmarked memcached
Holger - who has been testing/patching/contributing to various
subsystems since ~2008
Shuang - researcher at University of Rochester
benchmarked fio and provided a report
Sofia - EDI https://www.edi.works
benchmarked the top eight memory hogs and provided reports
Can you please provide your Tested-by tags? This will ensure the credit
for your contributions.
Thanks!
Powered by blists - more mailing lists