[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20220111131601.u36j6grsvnir5gvp@houat>
Date: Tue, 11 Jan 2022 14:16:01 +0100
From: Maxime Ripard <maxime@...no.tech>
To: Javier Martinez Canillas <javierm@...hat.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-fbdev@...r.kernel.org,
Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@...ll.ch>,
dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org,
Kris Karas <bugs-a21@...nlit-rail.com>,
Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org>,
Peter Robinson <pbrobinson@...il.com>,
Thomas Zimmermann <tzimmermann@...e.de>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Borislav Petkov <bp@...e.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/2] video: A couple of fixes for the vga16fb driver
Hi,
On Mon, Jan 10, 2022 at 10:56:23AM +0100, Javier Martinez Canillas wrote:
> This patch series contains two fixes for the vga16fb driver. I looked at
> the driver due a regression reported [0], caused by commit d391c5827107
> ("drivers/firmware: move x86 Generic System Framebuffers support").
>
> The mentioned commit didn't change any logic but just moved the platform
> device registration that matches the vesafb and efifb drivers to happen
> later. And this caused the vga16fb driver to be probed even in machines
> that don't have an EGA or VGA video adapter.
>
> This is a v2 of the patch series that addresses issues pointed out by
> Geert Uytterhoeven.
>
> Patch #1 is fixing the wrong check to determine if either EGA or VGA is
> used and patch #2 adds a check to the driver to only be loaded for EGA
> and VGA 16 color graphic cards.
For both patches,
Acked-by: Maxime Ripard <maxime@...no.tech>
Maxime
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (229 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists