[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Yd2IVM1q2Mmck3fJ@casper.infradead.org>
Date: Tue, 11 Jan 2022 13:38:28 +0000
From: Matthew Wilcox <willy@...radead.org>
To: Aleksandr Nogikh <nogikh@...gle.com>
Cc: cruise k <cruise4k@...il.com>, Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@...gle.com>,
Alexander Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>,
linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
sunhao.th@...il.com, syzkaller <syzkaller@...glegroups.com>
Subject: Re: INFO: task hung in path_openat
On Tue, Jan 11, 2022 at 10:38:02AM +0100, Aleksandr Nogikh wrote:
> Hi Matthew,
>
> That report was not sent by syzbot, rather by someone else. syzbot tries to
> be much more careful with the INFO: reports.
>
> During the past couple of weeks there has been some outburst of similar
> reports from various senders - this is the third different sender I see,
> probably there are also much more.
Right. Perhaps syzcaller could *not* call sched_setscheduler() by
default. Require an --i-know-what-im-doing-and-wont-submit-bogus-reports
flag to be specified by the user in order to call that syscall?
Powered by blists - more mailing lists