lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Tue, 11 Jan 2022 07:49:57 -0800
From:   Luis Chamberlain <mcgrof@...nel.org>
To:     Vimal Agrawal <avimalin@...il.com>
Cc:     Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>,
        Vimal Agrawal <vimal.Agrawal@...hos.com>,
        Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@...nel.org>,
        Michal Marek <michal.lkml@...kovi.net>,
        Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@...gle.com>,
        Jan Beulich <JBeulich@...e.com>, Jeff Mahoney <jeffm@...e.com>,
        Sam Ravnborg <sam@...nborg.org>, linux-kbuild@...r.kernel.org,
        jeyu@...nel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] kernel/module.c: heuristic enhancement when
 INSTALL_MOD_STRIP= "--strip-unneeded" is used

On Sat, Dec 25, 2021 at 06:38:02AM +0530, Vimal Agrawal wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 24, 2021 at 12:17 PM Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org> wrote:
> >
> > I don't think we can support passing arbitrary linker options and
> > expects things to work.  If we want to support --strip-unneeded
> > it needs a good rationale and be added as a direct config option.
> INSTALL_MOD_STRIP was provided to give flexibility for providing
> strippping options.

Yes but the point here is the heuristic you are adding for
when "--strip-unneeded" is used is now *always* being used and
we have no way of knowing this. So I'd agree with Christoph that
if we want to support this it might make sense to make a kconfig
option for enabling "--strip-unneeded" and then another for this
heuristic.

You may want to work on top of Aaron's patches as that would make
adding new kconfig entries for modules much cleaner:

https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20220106234319.2067842-1-atomlin@redhat.com

I hope to review those this week, so I might have a tree you can
work off on by the end of this or next week.

  Luis

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ