linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] ALSA: hda: cs35l41: fix double free in cs35l41_hda

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <s5hee5eb6cr.wl-tiwai@suse.de>
Date:   Tue, 11 Jan 2022 17:11:00 +0100
From:   Takashi Iwai <tiwai@...e.de>
To:     Tom Rix <trix@...hat.com>
Cc:     Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@...il.com>,
        "james.schulman@...rus.com" <james.schulman@...rus.com>,
        "david.rhodes@...rus.com" <david.rhodes@...rus.com>,
        "tanureal@...nsource.cirrus.com" <tanureal@...nsource.cirrus.com>,
        "perex@...ex.cz" <perex@...ex.cz>,
        "tiwai@...e.com" <tiwai@...e.com>,
        "nathan@...nel.org" <nathan@...nel.org>,
        "ndesaulniers@...gle.com" <ndesaulniers@...gle.com>,
        "alsa-devel@...a-project.org" <alsa-devel@...a-project.org>,
        "patches@...nsource.cirrus.com" <patches@...nsource.cirrus.com>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        "llvm@...ts.linux.dev" <llvm@...ts.linux.dev>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ALSA: hda: cs35l41: fix double free in cs35l41_hda_probe()

On Mon, 10 Jan 2022 11:21:11 +0100,
Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> 
> On Mon, Jan 10, 2022 at 2:37 AM Tom Rix <trix@...hat.com> wrote:
> > On 1/9/22 2:33 PM, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> > On Saturday, January 8, 2022, <trix@...hat.com> wrote:
> 
> ...
> 
> >> +       if (unlikely(ret)) {
> >
> > This is double weird. First of all, wtf unlikely is here? Second, I commented on the patch that does something with this driver and pointed out to the return 0 in some cases. This one seems a band aid.
> >
> > Unlikely to have an error.
> 
> We don't use likely() and unlikely() here and there, you need to
> provide a very good justification of its use.
> 
> For the record, I forwarded you my review against the code where you
> can find much more issues with it that are subject to fix / amend.

For this particular bug fix, Dan submitted a simpler patch and I took
it now:
  https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220111072232.GG11243@kili


thanks,

Takashi