linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH net 3/3] net/smc: Resolve the race between SMC-R link access and clear

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <eecadb47-92f3-c4cc-64d2-3954474e3c5f@linux.alibaba.com>
Date:   Wed, 12 Jan 2022 00:44:41 +0800
From:   Wen Gu <guwen@...ux.alibaba.com>
To:     Karsten Graul <kgraul@...ux.ibm.com>, davem@...emloft.net,
        kuba@...nel.org
Cc:     linux-s390@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net 3/3] net/smc: Resolve the race between SMC-R link
 access and clear



On 2022/1/12 00:02, Karsten Graul wrote:
> On 11/01/2022 16:49, Wen Gu wrote:
>>
>> OK, I will correct this as well.
>>
>> And similarly I want to move smc_ibdev_cnt_dec() and put_device() to
>> __smcr_link_clear() as well to ensure that put link related resources
>> only when link is actually cleared. What do you think?
> 
> I think that's a good idea, yes.

Thank you.

Not in a hurry, just want to ask should I send a v2 with these changes
or continue to wait for subsequent review of v1?

Thanks,
Wen Gu