linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 09/15] rpmsg: smd: Drop unnecessary condition for channel creation

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <Yd9KebiZUjTuHtIM@gerhold.net>
Date:   Wed, 12 Jan 2022 22:39:53 +0100
From:   Stephan Gerhold <stephan@...hold.net>
To:     Luca Weiss <luca@...tu.xyz>
Cc:     linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org,
        ~postmarketos/upstreaming@...ts.sr.ht, phone-devel@...r.kernel.org,
        Vladimir Lypak <vladimir.lypak@...il.com>,
        Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@...ainline.org>,
        Andy Gross <agross@...nel.org>,
        Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@...aro.org>,
        Ohad Ben-Cohen <ohad@...ery.com>,
        Mathieu Poirier <mathieu.poirier@...aro.org>,
        linux-remoteproc@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        Srinivas Kandagatla <srinivas.kandagatla@...aro.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 09/15] rpmsg: smd: Drop unnecessary condition for channel
 creation

Hi,

+Cc Srinivas

On Wed, Jan 12, 2022 at 08:40:58PM +0100, Luca Weiss wrote:
> From: Vladimir Lypak <vladimir.lypak@...il.com>
> 
> RPM Firmware on variety of newer SoCs such as MSM8917 (also likely
> MSM8937, MSM8940, MSM8952), MSM8953 and on some MSM8916 devices) doesn't
> initiate opening of the SMD channel if it was previously opened by
> bootloader. This doesn't allow probing of smd-rpm driver on such devices
> because there is a check that requires RPM this behaviour.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Vladimir Lypak <vladimir.lypak@...il.com>
> Signed-off-by: Luca Weiss <luca@...tu.xyz>
> Reviewed-by: Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@...ainline.org>

This is effectively a "Revert "Revert "rpmsg: smd: Create device for all
channels""":

https://lore.kernel.org/linux-arm-msm/20171212235857.10432-3-bjorn.andersson@linaro.org/
https://lore.kernel.org/linux-arm-msm/20180315181244.8859-1-bjorn.andersson@linaro.org/

Won't this cause the same regression reported by Srinivas again?

Thanks,
Stephan

> ---
>  drivers/rpmsg/qcom_smd.c | 8 +-------
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 7 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/rpmsg/qcom_smd.c b/drivers/rpmsg/qcom_smd.c
> index 8da1b5cb31b3..6a01ef932b01 100644
> --- a/drivers/rpmsg/qcom_smd.c
> +++ b/drivers/rpmsg/qcom_smd.c
> @@ -1280,19 +1280,13 @@ static void qcom_channel_state_worker(struct work_struct *work)
>  	unsigned long flags;
>  
>  	/*
> -	 * Register a device for any closed channel where the remote processor
> -	 * is showing interest in opening the channel.
> +	 * Register a device for any closed channel.
>  	 */
>  	spin_lock_irqsave(&edge->channels_lock, flags);
>  	list_for_each_entry(channel, &edge->channels, list) {
>  		if (channel->state != SMD_CHANNEL_CLOSED)
>  			continue;
>  
> -		remote_state = GET_RX_CHANNEL_INFO(channel, state);
> -		if (remote_state != SMD_CHANNEL_OPENING &&
> -		    remote_state != SMD_CHANNEL_OPENED)
> -			continue;
> -
>  		if (channel->registered)
>  			continue;
>  
> -- 
> 2.34.1
>