linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH][RESEND] sata_fsl: Use struct

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <df3eefdc-d8d1-48fa-f5f7-9c2f2382842b@kernel.dk>
Date:   Wed, 12 Jan 2022 15:23:40 -0700
From:   Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>
To:     Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>
Cc:     linux-ide@...r.kernel.org,
        Damien Le Moal <damien.lemoal@...nsource.wdc.com>,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-hardening@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH][RESEND] sata_fsl: Use struct_group() for memcpy() region

On 1/12/22 3:06 PM, Kees Cook wrote:
> In preparation for FORTIFY_SOURCE performing compile-time and run-time
> field bounds checking for memcpy(), memmove(), and memset(), avoid
> intentionally writing across neighboring fields.
> 
> Use struct_group() in struct command_desc around members acmd and fill,
> so they can be referenced together. This will allow memset(), memcpy(),
> and sizeof() to more easily reason about sizes, improve readability,
> and avoid future warnings about writing beyond the end of acmd:
> 
> In function 'fortify_memset_chk',
>     inlined from 'sata_fsl_qc_prep' at drivers/ata/sata_fsl.c:534:3:
> ./include/linux/fortify-string.h:199:4: warning: call to '__write_overflow_field' declared with attribute warning: detected write beyond size of field (1st parameter); maybe use struct_group()? [-Wattribute-warning]
>   199 |    __write_overflow_field();
>       |    ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> 
> Cc: Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>
> Cc: linux-ide@...r.kernel.org
> Signed-off-by: Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>
> ---
> Jens, can you take (or Ack) this? It's a dependency for the FORTIFY_SOURCE
> improvements that are close to being finished. :)

I don't maintain libata anymore, so Damien is the guy to nudge ;-)

-- 
Jens Axboe