linux-kernel - [PATCH] firmware_loader: simplfy builtin or module check

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20220112023416.215644-1-mcgrof@kernel.org>
Date:   Tue, 11 Jan 2022 18:34:16 -0800
From:   Luis Chamberlain <mcgrof@...nel.org>
To:     gregkh@...uxfoundation.org, bp@...e.de
Cc:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org,
        Luis Chamberlain <mcgrof@...nel.org>,
        Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>
Subject: [PATCH] firmware_loader: simplfy builtin or module check

The existing check is outdated and confuses developers. Use the
already existing IS_ENABLED() defined on kconfig.h which makes
the intention much clearer.

Reported-by: Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>
Reported-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Luis Chamberlain <mcgrof@...nel.org>
---
 include/linux/firmware.h | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/include/linux/firmware.h b/include/linux/firmware.h
index 3b057dfc8284..fa3493dbe84a 100644
--- a/include/linux/firmware.h
+++ b/include/linux/firmware.h
@@ -34,7 +34,7 @@ static inline bool firmware_request_builtin(struct firmware *fw,
 }
 #endif
 
-#if defined(CONFIG_FW_LOADER) || (defined(CONFIG_FW_LOADER_MODULE) && defined(MODULE))
+#if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_FW_LOADER)
 int request_firmware(const struct firmware **fw, const char *name,
 		     struct device *device);
 int firmware_request_nowarn(const struct firmware **fw, const char *name,
-- 
2.34.1