linux-kernel - Re: [RFC PATCH 0/6] fprobe: Introduce fprobe function entry/exit probe

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Wed, 12 Jan 2022 20:08:40 +0900
From:   Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@...nel.org>
To:     Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@...nel.org>
Cc:     Alexei Starovoitov <alexei.starovoitov@...il.com>,
        Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...hat.com>,
        Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>,
        Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>,
        Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@...nel.org>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
        bpf@...r.kernel.org, lkml <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Martin KaFai Lau <kafai@...com>,
        Song Liu <songliubraving@...com>, Yonghong Song <yhs@...com>,
        John Fastabend <john.fastabend@...il.com>,
        KP Singh <kpsingh@...omium.org>,
        Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
        "Naveen N . Rao" <naveen.n.rao@...ux.ibm.com>,
        Anil S Keshavamurthy <anil.s.keshavamurthy@...el.com>,
        "David S . Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 0/6] fprobe: Introduce fprobe function entry/exit
 probe

On Wed, 12 Jan 2022 16:33:53 +0900
Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@...nel.org> wrote:

> Hi Alexei,
> 
> On Tue, 11 Jan 2022 14:39:44 -0800
> Alexei Starovoitov <alexei.starovoitov@...il.com> wrote:
> 
> > On Wed, Jan 12, 2022 at 12:00:17AM +0900, Masami Hiramatsu wrote:
> > > Hi Jiri,
> > > 
> > > Here is a short series of patches, which shows what I replied
> > > to your series.
> > > 
> > > This introduces the fprobe, the function entry/exit probe with
> > > multiple probe point support. This also introduces the rethook
> > > for hooking function return, which I cloned from kretprobe.
> > > 
> > > I also rewrite your [08/13] bpf patch to use this fprobe instead
> > > of kprobes. I didn't tested that one, but the sample module seems
> > > to work. Please test bpf part with your libbpf updates.
> > > 
> > > BTW, while implementing the fprobe, I introduced the per-probe
> > > point private data, but I'm not sure why you need it. It seems
> > > that data is not used from bpf...
> > > 
> > > If this is good for you, I would like to proceed this with
> > > the rethook and rewrite the kretprobe to use the rethook to
> > > hook the functions. That should be much cleaner (and easy to
> > > prepare for the fgraph tracer integration)
> > 
> > What is the speed of attach/detach of thousands fprobes?
> 
> I've treaked my example module and it shows below result;
> 
> /lib/modules/5.16.0-rc4+/kernel/samples/fprobe # time insmod ./fprobe_example.ko
>  symbol='btrfs_*'
> [  187.095925] fprobe_init: 1028 symbols found
> [  188.521694] fprobe_init: Planted fprobe at btrfs_*
> real	0m 1.47s
> user	0m 0.00s
> sys	0m 1.36s
> 
> I think using ftrace_set_filter_ips() can make it faster.
> (maybe it needs to drop per-probe point private data, that
> prevents fprobe to use that interface)

OK, I've updated fprobes to use the ftrace_set_filter_ips()
and got below result.

/lib/modules/5.16.0-rc4+/kernel/samples/fprobe # time insmod fprobe_example.ko s
ymbol='btrfs_*' 
[   36.130947] fprobe_init: 1028 symbols found
[   36.177901] fprobe_init: Planted fprobe at btrfs_*
real	0m 0.08s
user	0m 0.00s
sys	0m 0.07s

Let me update the series :)

Thank you,


-- 
Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@...nel.org>