linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] Revert "i2c: core: support bus regulator controlling in adapter"

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAJMQK-g1pqg05K+ZL0R3i67gitEVoZQ2jbOuL=Q2djBr45soAg@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Wed, 12 Jan 2022 20:24:48 +0800
From:   Hsin-Yi Wang <hsinyi@...omium.org>
To:     Tareque Md Hanif <tarequemd.hanif@...oo.com>
Cc:     Wolfram Sang <wsa@...nel.org>, linux-i2c@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, amd-gfx@...ts.freedesktop.org,
        Bibby Hsieh <bibby.hsieh@...iatek.com>,
        Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@...sung.com>,
        Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Revert "i2c: core: support bus regulator controlling in adapter"

On Wed, Jan 12, 2022 at 6:58 PM Hsin-Yi Wang <hsinyi@...omium.org> wrote:
>
> hi Konstantin and Tareque,
>
> Can you help provide logs if we apply
> 5a7b95fb993ec399c8a685552aa6a8fc995c40bd but revert
> 8d35a2596164c1c9d34d4656fd42b445cd1e247f?
>
Another thing might be helpful to test with:

after apply 5a7b95fb993ec399c8a685552aa6a8fc995c40bd
1. delete SET_LATE_SYSTEM_SLEEP_PM_OPS(i2c_suspend_late,
i2c_resume_early) and function i2c_suspend_late() and
i2c_resume_early().
2. delete SET_RUNTIME_PM_OPS(i2c_runtime_suspend, i2c_runtime_resume,
NULL) and function i2c_runtime_suspend() and i2c_runtime_resume().

Does it still fail if we do 1 or 2?

Sorry that we don't have a platform with intel CPU and amd GPU
combination to test with.


> Thanks
>
> On Wed, Jan 12, 2022 at 6:02 PM Tareque Md Hanif
> <tarequemd.hanif@...oo.com> wrote:
> >
> >
> > On 1/12/22 15:51, Wolfram Sang wrote:
> > > would the reporters of the
> > > regression be available for further testing?
> > Sure. I am available.