lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Wed, 12 Jan 2022 14:51:56 +0000
From:   Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
To:     perex@...ex.cz, pavel@....cz, sre@...nel.org,
        Jiasheng Jiang <jiasheng@...as.ac.cn>, lgirdwood@...il.com,
        tony@...mide.com, tiwai@...e.com
Cc:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, alsa-devel@...a-project.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ASoC: cpcap: Check for NULL pointer after calling of_get_child_by_name

On Tue, 11 Jan 2022 10:50:48 +0800, Jiasheng Jiang wrote:
> If the device does not exist, of_get_child_by_name() will return NULL
> pointer.
> And devm_snd_soc_register_component() does not check it.
> Also, I have noticed that cpcap_codec_driver has not been used yet.
> Therefore, it should be better to check it in order to avoid the future
> dereference of the NULL pointer.
> 
> [...]

Applied to

   https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/broonie/sound.git for-linus

Thanks!

[1/1] ASoC: cpcap: Check for NULL pointer after calling of_get_child_by_name
      commit: f7a6021aaf02088870559f82fc13c58cda7fea1a

All being well this means that it will be integrated into the linux-next
tree (usually sometime in the next 24 hours) and sent to Linus during
the next merge window (or sooner if it is a bug fix), however if
problems are discovered then the patch may be dropped or reverted.

You may get further e-mails resulting from automated or manual testing
and review of the tree, please engage with people reporting problems and
send followup patches addressing any issues that are reported if needed.

If any updates are required or you are submitting further changes they
should be sent as incremental updates against current git, existing
patches will not be replaced.

Please add any relevant lists and maintainers to the CCs when replying
to this mail.

Thanks,
Mark

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ