[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAHp75Vd=gxF9jFMvRw3qM9rfsxxCsO8qYXKVheuhjOV7ypU9og@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 12 Jan 2022 17:41:08 +0200
From: Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@...il.com>
To: Akhil R <akhilrajeev@...dia.com>
Cc: Christian Koenig <christian.koenig@....com>,
Dmitry Osipenko <digetx@...il.com>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Jon Hunter <jonathanh@...dia.com>,
Laxman Dewangan <ldewangan@...dia.com>,
linux-i2c <linux-i2c@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-tegra <linux-tegra@...r.kernel.org>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>,
Sumit Semwal <sumit.semwal@...aro.org>,
Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@...il.com>,
Wolfram Sang <wsa@...nel.org>, Len Brown <lenb@...nel.org>,
ACPI Devel Maling List <linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 3/3] i2c: smbus: Use device_*() functions instead of of_*()
On Wed, Jan 12, 2022 at 4:15 PM Akhil R <akhilrajeev@...dia.com> wrote:
>
> Change of_*() functions to device_*() for firmware agnostic usage.
> This allows to have smbus_alert interrupt without any changes
the smbus_alert
> in the controller drivers using ACPI table.
the ACPI
...
This change reveals potential issue:
> - irq = of_irq_get_byname(adapter->dev.of_node, "smbus_alert");
> + irq = device_irq_get_byname(adapter->dev.parent, "smbus_alert");
> if (irq <= 0)
I guess this '= 0' part should be fixed first.
> return irq;
--
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko
Powered by blists - more mailing lists