[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Yd7/yUFQr3pbqVCi@google.com>
Date: Wed, 12 Jan 2022 16:20:25 +0000
From: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@...gle.com>
To: Like Xu <like.xu.linux@...il.com>
Cc: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>,
Jim Mattson <jmattson@...gle.com>,
Wanpeng Li <wanpengli@...cent.com>,
Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@...hat.com>,
Joerg Roedel <joro@...tes.org>, x86@...nel.org,
kvm@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] KVM: x86: Make the module parameter of vPMU more
common
On Wed, Jan 12, 2022, Like Xu wrote:
> ---
> v1 -> v2 Changelog:
> - prefer we keep "pmu" for the module param; (Sean)
...
> +/* Enable/disable PMU virtualization */
> +bool __read_mostly pmu = true;
> +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(pmu);
> +module_param(pmu, bool, 0444);
Sorry, I should have been more explicit. What I meant was this:
/* Enable/disable PMU virtualization */
bool __read_mostly enable_pmu = true;
module_param_named(pmu, enable_pmu, bool, 0444);
That way KVM can use "enable_pmu" for all its checks, but the user only needs to
type "pmu=?" when manipulating the module param.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists