linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 3/6] KVM: Remove opaque from kvm_arch_check_processor

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <Yd8OFT80exMeCMVA@google.com>
Date:   Wed, 12 Jan 2022 17:21:25 +0000
From:   Sean Christopherson <seanjc@...gle.com>
To:     Chao Gao <chao.gao@...el.com>
Cc:     kvm@...r.kernel.org, pbonzini@...hat.com, kevin.tian@...el.com,
        tglx@...utronix.de, Marc Zyngier <maz@...nel.org>,
        James Morse <james.morse@....com>,
        Alexandru Elisei <alexandru.elisei@....com>,
        Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@....com>,
        Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
        Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>,
        Huacai Chen <chenhuacai@...nel.org>,
        Aleksandar Markovic <aleksandar.qemu.devel@...il.com>,
        Thomas Bogendoerfer <tsbogend@...ha.franken.de>,
        Michael Ellerman <mpe@...erman.id.au>,
        Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>,
        Paul Mackerras <paulus@...ba.org>,
        Anup Patel <anup.patel@....com>,
        Atish Patra <atish.patra@....com>,
        Paul Walmsley <paul.walmsley@...ive.com>,
        Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@...belt.com>,
        Albert Ou <aou@...s.berkeley.edu>,
        Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@...ux.ibm.com>,
        Janosch Frank <frankja@...ux.ibm.com>,
        David Hildenbrand <david@...hat.com>,
        Claudio Imbrenda <imbrenda@...ux.ibm.com>,
        Heiko Carstens <hca@...ux.ibm.com>,
        Vasily Gorbik <gor@...ux.ibm.com>,
        Alexander Gordeev <agordeev@...ux.ibm.com>,
        Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@...hat.com>,
        Wanpeng Li <wanpengli@...cent.com>,
        Jim Mattson <jmattson@...gle.com>,
        Joerg Roedel <joro@...tes.org>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
        Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
        Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>, x86@...nel.org,
        "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
        "Maciej S. Szmigiero" <maciej.szmigiero@...cle.com>,
        Fabiano Rosas <farosas@...ux.ibm.com>,
        Ravi Bangoria <ravi.bangoria@...ux.ibm.com>,
        Cédric Le Goater <clg@...d.org>,
        Bharata B Rao <bharata@...ux.ibm.com>,
        Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@...il.com>,
        linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, kvmarm@...ts.cs.columbia.edu,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-mips@...r.kernel.org,
        linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org, kvm-riscv@...ts.infradead.org,
        linux-riscv@...ts.infradead.org, linux-s390@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/6] KVM: Remove opaque from
 kvm_arch_check_processor_compat

On Wed, Jan 12, 2022, Sean Christopherson wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 11, 2022, Chao Gao wrote:
> > On Mon, Jan 10, 2022 at 11:06:44PM +0000, Sean Christopherson wrote:
> > >On Mon, Dec 27, 2021, Chao Gao wrote:
> > >> No arch implementation uses this opaque now.
> > >
> > >Except for the RISC-V part, this can be a pure revert of commit b99040853738 ("KVM:
> > >Pass kvm_init()'s opaque param to additional arch funcs").  I think it makes sense
> > >to process it as a revert, with a short blurb in the changelog to note that RISC-V
> > >is manually modified as RISC-V support came along in the interim.
> > 
> > commit b99040853738 adds opaque param to kvm_arch_hardware_setup(), which isn't
> > reverted in this patch. I.e., this patch is a partial revert of b99040853738
> > plus manual changes to RISC-V. Given that, "process it as a revert" means
> > clearly say in changelog that this commit contains a partial revert of commit
> > b99040853738 ("KVM: Pass kvm_init()'s opaque param to additional arch funcs").
> > 
> > Right?
> 
> What I meant is literally do
> 
>   git revert -s b99040853738
> 
> and then manually handle RISC-V.

Doh, to be clear, "manually handle RISC-V _in the same commit_".