[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Yd8XEhgN/RCO8Q4l@kernel.org>
Date: Wed, 12 Jan 2022 14:59:46 -0300
From: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org>
To: John Garry <john.garry@...wei.com>
Cc: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <arnaldo.melo@...il.com>,
Ian Rogers <irogers@...gle.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@...ux.intel.com>,
Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...hat.com>,
Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>,
Jin Yao <yao.jin@...ux.intel.com>,
"Paul A . Clarke" <pc@...ibm.com>,
linux-perf-users@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
eranian@...gle.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/2] perf test: Workload test of metric and
metricgroups
Em Wed, Jan 12, 2022 at 05:32:56PM +0000, John Garry escreveu:
> On 12/01/2022 13:34, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:
> > > > > v3. Fix test condition (thanks to Paul A. Clarke<pc@...ibm.com>). Add a
> > > > > fallback case of a larger workload so that we don't ignore "<not
> > > > > counted>".
> > > > > v2. Switched the workload to something faster.
> > > Hi Ian,
> > >
> > > I just noticed that this test fails on my broadwell machine.
> > >
> > > I am using acme perf/core @ 09dd3c22daaf
> > Hi,
> >
> > Can you try with tmp.perf/perf_cpu instead?
> >
> > There's a patch there that maybe fixes this.
>
> Yeah, that (metricgroups) test passes on that branch. I assume it's the test
> script -a change...
Can I get that as a Tested-by: you tag?
- Arnaldo
Powered by blists - more mailing lists