linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH -V10 RESEND 0/6] NUMA balancing: optimize memory placement for memory tiering system

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <87sftsumqd.fsf@yhuang6-desk2.ccr.corp.intel.com>
Date:   Thu, 13 Jan 2022 15:19:06 +0800
From:   "Huang, Ying" <ying.huang@...el.com>
To:     Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Cc:     Mel Gorman <mgorman@...e.de>, linux-mm@...ck.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Feng Tang <feng.tang@...el.com>,
        Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
        Michal Hocko <mhocko@...e.com>,
        Rik van Riel <riel@...riel.com>,
        Mel Gorman <mgorman@...hsingularity.net>,
        Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>,
        Yang Shi <shy828301@...il.com>, Zi Yan <ziy@...dia.com>,
        Wei Xu <weixugc@...gle.com>, osalvador <osalvador@...e.de>,
        Shakeel Butt <shakeelb@...gle.com>,
        Hasan Al Maruf <hasanalmaruf@...com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH -V10 RESEND 0/6] NUMA balancing: optimize memory
 placement for memory tiering system

Hi, Peter,

Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org> writes:

> On Tue, Dec 07, 2021 at 10:27:51AM +0800, Huang Ying wrote:
>> After commit c221c0b0308f ("device-dax: "Hotplug" persistent memory
>> for use like normal RAM"), the PMEM could be used as the
>> cost-effective volatile memory in separate NUMA nodes.  In a typical
>> memory tiering system, there are CPUs, DRAM and PMEM in each physical
>> NUMA node.  The CPUs and the DRAM will be put in one logical node,
>> while the PMEM will be put in another (faked) logical node.
>
> So what does a system like that actually look like, SLIT table wise, and
> how does that affect init_numa_topology_type() ?

The SLIT table is as follows,

[000h 0000   4]                    Signature : "SLIT"    [System Locality Information Table]
[004h 0004   4]                 Table Length : 0000042C
[008h 0008   1]                     Revision : 01
[009h 0009   1]                     Checksum : 59
[00Ah 0010   6]                       Oem ID : "INTEL "
[010h 0016   8]                 Oem Table ID : "S2600WF "
[018h 0024   4]                 Oem Revision : 00000001
[01Ch 0028   4]              Asl Compiler ID : "INTL"
[020h 0032   4]        Asl Compiler Revision : 20091013

[024h 0036   8]                   Localities : 0000000000000004
[02Ch 0044   4]                 Locality   0 : 0A 15 11 1C
[030h 0048   4]                 Locality   1 : 15 0A 1C 11
[034h 0052   4]                 Locality   2 : 11 1C 0A 1C
[038h 0056   4]                 Locality   3 : 1C 11 1C 0A

The `numactl -H` output is as follows,

available: 4 nodes (0-3)
node 0 cpus: 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71
node 0 size: 64136 MB
node 0 free: 5981 MB
node 1 cpus: 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95
node 1 size: 64466 MB
node 1 free: 10415 MB
node 2 cpus:
node 2 size: 253952 MB
node 2 free: 253920 MB
node 3 cpus:
node 3 size: 253952 MB
node 3 free: 253951 MB
node distances:
node   0   1   2   3 
  0:  10  21  17  28 
  1:  21  10  28  17 
  2:  17  28  10  28 
  3:  28  17  28  10 

init_numa_topology_type() set sched_numa_topology_type to NUMA_DIRECT.

The node 0 and node 1 are onlined during boot.  While the PMEM node,
that is, node 2 and node 3 are onlined later.  As in the following dmesg
snippet.

[    2.252573][    T0] ACPI: SRAT: Node 0 PXM 0 [mem 0x00000000-0x7fffffff]
[    2.259224][    T0] ACPI: SRAT: Node 0 PXM 0 [mem 0x100000000-0x107fffffff]
[    2.266139][    T0] ACPI: SRAT: Node 2 PXM 2 [mem 0x1080000000-0x4f7fffffff] non-volatile
[    2.274267][    T0] ACPI: SRAT: Node 1 PXM 1 [mem 0x4f80000000-0x5f7fffffff]
[    2.281271][    T0] ACPI: SRAT: Node 3 PXM 3 [mem 0x5f80000000-0x9e7fffffff] non-volatile
[    2.289403][    T0] NUMA: Initialized distance table, cnt=4
[    2.294934][    T0] NUMA: Node 0 [mem 0x00000000-0x7fffffff] + [mem 0x100000000-0x107fffffff] -> [mem 0x00000000-0x107fffffff]
[    2.306266][    T0] NODE_DATA(0) allocated [mem 0x107ffd5000-0x107fffffff]
[    2.313115][    T0] NODE_DATA(1) allocated [mem 0x5f7ffd0000-0x5f7fffafff]

[    5.391151][    T1] smp: Brought up 2 nodes, 96 CPUs

Full dmesg is attached.

Best Regards,
Huang, Ying


Download attachment "dmesg.xz" of type "application/x-xz" (27120 bytes)