lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Thu, 13 Jan 2022 08:25:49 +0100
From:   Jiri Slaby <jirislaby@...nel.org>
To:     Yu Tu <yu.tu@...ogic.com>, linux-serial@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
        linux-amlogic@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        devicetree@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
        Neil Armstrong <narmstrong@...libre.com>,
        Kevin Hilman <khilman@...libre.com>,
        Jerome Brunet <jbrunet@...libre.com>,
        Martin Blumenstingl <martin.blumenstingl@...glemail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V5 2/5] tty: serial: meson: Move request the register
 region.

On 11. 01. 22, 3:48, Yu Tu wrote:
>> And no, do not resend a new version in the next few days. Having v5 in 
>> 20 days is a bit too much. Give maintainers and reviewers some more 
>> space to express themselves.
> I am so sorry if PATCH is sent too frequently, which has disturbed you.
> How often should I send it? Or under what circumstances can I send the 
> next version?

~ one week after the last reply to your previous patchset is about fine. 
You could see that people were still responding to v4 while v5 was 
already on the list.

thanks,
-- 
js

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ