Message-ID: <00633ae4-0b9f-f881-6944-9a43ba3781ae@redhat.com>
Date:   Thu, 13 Jan 2022 16:43:45 +0800
From:   Gavin Shan <gshan@...hat.com>
To:     Eric Auger <eauger@...hat.com>, kvmarm@...ts.cs.columbia.edu
Cc:     kvm@...r.kernel.org, maz@...nel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        shan.gavin@...il.com, Jonathan.Cameron@...wei.com,
        pbonzini@...hat.com, vkuznets@...hat.com, will@...nel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 07/15] KVM: arm64: Support page-not-present
 notification

Hi Eric,

On 11/12/21 11:01 PM, Eric Auger wrote:
> On 8/15/21 2:59 AM, Gavin Shan wrote:
>> The requested page might be not resident in memory during the stage-2
>> page fault. For example, the requested page could be resident in swap
>> device (file). In this case, disk I/O is issued in order to fetch the
>> requested page and it could take tens of milliseconds, even hundreds
>> of milliseconds in extreme situation. During the period, the guest's
>> vCPU is suspended until the requested page becomes ready. Actually,
>> the something else on the guest's vCPU could be rescheduled during
> s/the//

ok.

>> the period, so that the time slice isn't wasted as the guest's vCPU
>> can see. This is the primary goal of the feature (Asynchronous Page
>> Fault).
>>
>> This supports delivery of page-not-present notification through SDEI
>> event when the requested page isn't present. When the notification is
>> received on the guest's vCPU, something else (another process) can be
>> scheduled. The design is highlighted as below:
>>
>>     * There is dedicated memory region shared by host and guest. It's
>>       represented by "struct kvm_vcpu_pv_apf_data". The field @reason
>>       indicates the reason why the SDEI event is triggered, while the
>>       unique @token is used by guest to associate the event with the
>>       suspended process.
>>
>>     * One control block is associated with each guest's vCPU and it's
>>       represented by "struct kvm_arch_async_pf_control". It allows the
>>       guest to configure the functionality to indicate the situations
>>       where the host can deliver the page-not-present notification to
>>       kick off asyncrhonous page fault. Besides, runtime states are
> asynchronous

ok.

>>       also maintained in this struct.
>>
>>     * Before the page-not-present notification is sent to the guest's
>>       vCPU, a worker is started and executed asynchronously on host,
>>       to fetch the requested page. "struct kvm{_,_arch}async_pf" is
>>       associated with the worker, to track the work.
>>
>> The feature isn't enabled by CONFIG_KVM_ASYNC_PF yet. Also, the
>> page-ready notification delivery and control path isn't implemented
>> and will be done in the subsequent patches.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Gavin Shan <gshan@...hat.com>
>> ---
>>   arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_host.h      |  52 +++++++++
>>   arch/arm64/include/uapi/asm/kvm_para.h |  15 +++
>>   arch/arm64/kvm/Makefile                |   1 +
>>   arch/arm64/kvm/arm.c                   |   3 +
>>   arch/arm64/kvm/async_pf.c              | 145 +++++++++++++++++++++++++
>>   arch/arm64/kvm/mmu.c                   |  33 +++++-
>>   6 files changed, 247 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>>   create mode 100644 arch/arm64/kvm/async_pf.c
>>
>> diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_host.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_host.h
>> index 581825b9df77..6b98aef936b4 100644
>> --- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_host.h
>> +++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_host.h
>> @@ -283,6 +283,31 @@ struct vcpu_reset_state {
>>   	bool		reset;
>>   };
>>   
>> +/* Should be a power of two number */
>> +#define ASYNC_PF_PER_VCPU	64
>> +
>> +/*
>> + * The association of gfn and token. The token will be sent to guest as
>> + * page fault address. Also, the guest could be in aarch32 mode. So its
> s/as page fault address/together with page fault address?
>> + * length should be 32-bits.
>> + */
>> +struct kvm_arch_async_pf {
>> +	u32	token;
>> +	gfn_t	gfn;
>> +	u32	esr;
>> +};
>> +
>> +struct kvm_arch_async_pf_control {
>> +		struct gfn_to_hva_cache	cache;
>> +		u64			control_block;
>> +		bool			send_user_only;
>> +		u64			sdei_event_num;
>> +
> nit: spare empty line

It's intended because I want to keep two blocks separate
due to their usages :)

>> +		u16			id;
>> +		bool			notpresent_pending;
>> +		u32			notpresent_token;
>> +};
>> +
>>   struct kvm_vcpu_arch {
>>   	struct kvm_cpu_context ctxt;
>>   	void *sve_state;
>> @@ -346,6 +371,9 @@ struct kvm_vcpu_arch {
>>   	/* SDEI support */
>>   	struct kvm_sdei_vcpu *sdei;
>>   
>> +	/* Asynchronous page fault support */
>> +	struct kvm_arch_async_pf_control *apf;
>> +
>>   	/*
>>   	 * Guest registers we preserve during guest debugging.
>>   	 *
>> @@ -741,6 +769,30 @@ int kvm_arm_vcpu_arch_has_attr(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
>>   long kvm_vm_ioctl_mte_copy_tags(struct kvm *kvm,
>>   				struct kvm_arm_copy_mte_tags *copy_tags);
>>   
>> +#ifdef CONFIG_KVM_ASYNC_PF
>> +void kvm_arch_async_pf_create_vcpu(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu);
>> +bool kvm_arch_async_not_present_allowed(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu);
>> +bool kvm_arch_setup_async_pf(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
>> +			     u32 esr, gpa_t gpa, gfn_t gfn);
>> +bool kvm_arch_async_page_not_present(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
>> +				     struct kvm_async_pf *work);
>> +void kvm_arch_async_pf_destroy_vcpu(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu);
>> +#else
>> +static inline void kvm_arch_async_pf_create_vcpu(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu) { }
>> +static inline void kvm_arch_async_pf_destroy_vcpu(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu) { }
>> +
>> +static inline bool kvm_arch_async_not_present_allowed(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
>> +{
>> +	return false;
>> +}
>> +
>> +static inline bool kvm_arch_setup_async_pf(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
>> +					   u32 esr, gpa_t gpa, gfn_t gfn)
>> +{
>> +	return false;
>> +}
>> +#endif
>> +
>>   /* Guest/host FPSIMD coordination helpers */
>>   int kvm_arch_vcpu_run_map_fp(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu);
>>   void kvm_arch_vcpu_load_fp(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu);
>> diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/uapi/asm/kvm_para.h b/arch/arm64/include/uapi/asm/kvm_para.h
>> index cd212282b90c..3fa04006714e 100644
>> --- a/arch/arm64/include/uapi/asm/kvm_para.h
>> +++ b/arch/arm64/include/uapi/asm/kvm_para.h
>> @@ -2,4 +2,19 @@
>>   #ifndef _UAPI_ASM_ARM_KVM_PARA_H
>>   #define _UAPI_ASM_ARM_KVM_PARA_H
>>   
>> +#include <linux/types.h>
>> +
>> +/* Async PF */
>> +#define KVM_ASYNC_PF_ENABLED		(1 << 0)
>> +#define KVM_ASYNC_PF_SEND_ALWAYS	(1 << 1)
> The above define is not used in this patch. Besides can you explain what
> it aims at?

Yep, this should be dropped. When host receives stage-2 page fault, it's
unaware what context the guest is in. The guest can be in user or kernel
mode. It's safe to preempt (interrupt) the guest if it's in user mode
because of async PF. However, it's not safe to do when the guest in
kernel mode.

It seems it's supported on x86, but I didn't look into the details. So
we don't support it on ARM64 for now. It can be supported in future if
needed.

>> +
>> +#define KVM_PV_REASON_PAGE_NOT_PRESENT	1
>> +
>> +struct kvm_vcpu_pv_apf_data {
>> +	__u32	reason;
> on x86 it was renamed into flags. Should we do the same right now?
>> +	__u32	token;
>> +	__u8	pad[56];
>> +	__u32	enabled;
>> +};
>> +
>>   #endif /* _UAPI_ASM_ARM_KVM_PARA_H */
>> diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/Makefile b/arch/arm64/kvm/Makefile
>> index eefca8ca394d..c9aa307ea542 100644
>> --- a/arch/arm64/kvm/Makefile
>> +++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/Makefile
>> @@ -25,3 +25,4 @@ kvm-y := $(KVM)/kvm_main.o $(KVM)/coalesced_mmio.o $(KVM)/eventfd.o \
>>   	 vgic/vgic-its.o vgic/vgic-debug.o
>>   
>>   kvm-$(CONFIG_HW_PERF_EVENTS)  += pmu-emul.o
>> +kvm-$(CONFIG_KVM_ASYNC_PF) += $(KVM)/async_pf.o async_pf.o
>> diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/arm.c b/arch/arm64/kvm/arm.c
>> index 7d9bbc888ae5..af251896b41d 100644
>> --- a/arch/arm64/kvm/arm.c
>> +++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/arm.c
>> @@ -342,6 +342,8 @@ int kvm_arch_vcpu_create(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
>>   
>>   	kvm_sdei_create_vcpu(vcpu);
>>   
>> +	kvm_arch_async_pf_create_vcpu(vcpu);
>> +
>>   	vcpu->arch.hw_mmu = &vcpu->kvm->arch.mmu;
>>   
>>   	err = kvm_vgic_vcpu_init(vcpu);
>> @@ -363,6 +365,7 @@ void kvm_arch_vcpu_destroy(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
>>   	kvm_mmu_free_memory_cache(&vcpu->arch.mmu_page_cache);
>>   	kvm_timer_vcpu_terminate(vcpu);
>>   	kvm_pmu_vcpu_destroy(vcpu);
>> +	kvm_arch_async_pf_destroy_vcpu(vcpu);
>>   	kvm_sdei_destroy_vcpu(vcpu);
>>   
>>   	kvm_arm_vcpu_destroy(vcpu);
>> diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/async_pf.c b/arch/arm64/kvm/async_pf.c
>> new file mode 100644
>> index 000000000000..742bb8a0a8c0
>> --- /dev/null
>> +++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/async_pf.c
>> @@ -0,0 +1,145 @@
>> +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-only
>> +/*
>> + * Asynchronous page fault support.
>> + *
>> + * Copyright (C) 2021 Red Hat, Inc.
>> + *
>> + * Author(s): Gavin Shan <gshan@...hat.com>
>> + */
>> +
>> +#include <linux/arm-smccc.h>
>> +#include <linux/kvm_host.h>
>> +#include <asm/kvm_emulate.h>
>> +#include <kvm/arm_hypercalls.h>
>> +#include <kvm/arm_vgic.h>
>> +#include <asm/kvm_sdei.h>
>> +
>> +static inline int read_cache(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u32 offset, u32 *val)
>> +{
>> +	struct kvm *kvm = vcpu->kvm;
>> +	struct kvm_arch_async_pf_control *apf = vcpu->arch.apf;
>> +
>> +	return kvm_read_guest_offset_cached(kvm, &apf->cache,
>> +					    val, offset, sizeof(*val));
>> +}
>> +
>> +static inline int write_cache(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u32 offset, u32 val)
>> +{
>> +	struct kvm *kvm = vcpu->kvm;
>> +	struct kvm_arch_async_pf_control *apf = vcpu->arch.apf;
>> +
>> +	return kvm_write_guest_offset_cached(kvm, &apf->cache,
>> +					     &val, offset, sizeof(val));
>> +}
>> +
>> +void kvm_arch_async_pf_create_vcpu(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
>> +{
>> +	vcpu->arch.apf = kzalloc(sizeof(*(vcpu->arch.apf)), GFP_KERNEL);
> shouldn't we escalate the alloc failure and fail the vcpu creation
> instead of checking everywhere that apf is !null which is error prone.
> By the way I saw that on x86 this is a struct included in the vcpu one
> instead of a poinnter.

Ok. Lets embeded this struct to kvm_vcpu_arch, to avoid memory allocation
here. Async PF is a auxillary function and everything should work just
fine when it's disabled. It's why I didn't escalate the memory allocation
failure.

>> +}
>> +
>> +bool kvm_arch_async_not_present_allowed(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
>> +{
>> +	struct kvm *kvm = vcpu->kvm;
>> +	struct kvm_arch_async_pf_control *apf = vcpu->arch.apf;
>> +	struct kvm_sdei_vcpu *vsdei = vcpu->arch.sdei;
>> +	u32 reason, token;
>> +	int ret;
>> +
>> +	if (!apf || !(apf->control_block & KVM_ASYNC_PF_ENABLED))
>> +		return false;
>> +
>> +	if (apf->send_user_only && vcpu_mode_priv(vcpu))
>> +		return false;
>> +
>> +	if (!irqchip_in_kernel(vcpu->kvm))
>> +		return false;
> can you explain why this is needed?

Async PF uses SDEI event to deliver page-not-present notification. When
the guest receives the SDEI event, the associated handler is invoked.
After that, the hyper call (COMPLETE_AND_RESUME) is issued from guest
to host. When host receives this hypercall, all pending interrupts
should be delivered immediately. Without a in-kernel IRQ chip, we're
unable to do that.

>> +
>> +	if (!vsdei || vsdei->critical_event || vsdei->normal_event)
>> +		return false;
> don't you need some locking mechanism to void that vdsei fields change
> after that check? At the moment we may have a single SDEI num but
> nothing prevents from adding others in the future, right?

You're right that we currently have only one SDEI event. However,
additional inline helper with lock is needed for this in future.

>> +
>> +	/* Pending page fault, which isn't acknowledged by guest */
>> +	ret = read_cache(vcpu, offsetof(struct kvm_vcpu_pv_apf_data, reason),
>> +			 &reason);
>> +	if (ret) {
>> +		kvm_err("%s: Error %d to read reason (%d-%d)\n",
>> +			__func__, ret, kvm->userspace_pid, vcpu->vcpu_idx);
>> +		return false;
>> +	}
> x86 code does not have those kvm_err(). You may simply drop them.

It's useful for debugging. I may introduce a macro for this and it's
disabled by default.

>> +
>> +	ret = read_cache(vcpu, offsetof(struct kvm_vcpu_pv_apf_data, token),
>> +			 &token);
>> +	if (ret) {
>> +		kvm_err("%s: Error %d to read token %d-%d\n",
>> +			__func__, ret, kvm->userspace_pid, vcpu->vcpu_idx);
>> +		return false;
>> +	}
>> +
>> +	if (reason || token)
> can't the token be null?

Nice catch! My intend is @token can't be NULL. However, it's not true
in current implementation. Please refer to the explanation below.

>> +		return false;
>> +
>> +	return true;
>> +}
>> +
>> +bool kvm_arch_setup_async_pf(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
>> +			     u32 esr, gpa_t gpa, gfn_t gfn)
>> +{
>> +	struct kvm_arch_async_pf_control *apf = vcpu->arch.apf;
>> +	struct kvm_arch_async_pf arch;
>> +	unsigned long hva = kvm_vcpu_gfn_to_hva(vcpu, gfn);
>> +
>> +	arch.token = (apf->id++ << 12) | vcpu->vcpu_id;
>> +	arch.gfn = gfn;
>> +	arch.esr = esr;

@arch.token is spposed not NULL. However, "apf->id++" can overflow.
So we need change the code into:

         /*
          * The token is invalid when it's zero. To avoid that by
          * check if overflowing happens.
          */
	if (apf->id == USHORT_MAX)
            apf->id = 0;

	arch.token = (apf->id++ << 12) | vcpu->vcpu_id;
         arch.gfn = gfn;
	arch.esr = esr;

>> +
>> +	return kvm_setup_async_pf(vcpu, gpa, hva, &arch);
>> +}
>> +
>> +/*
>> + * It's guaranteed that no pending asynchronous page fault when this is
> that no APF is pending

Ok.

>> + * called. It means all previous issued asynchronous page faults have
>> + * been acknowledged.
>> + */
>> +bool kvm_arch_async_page_not_present(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
>> +				     struct kvm_async_pf *work)
>> +{
>> +	struct kvm *kvm = vcpu->kvm;
>> +	struct kvm_arch_async_pf_control *apf = vcpu->arch.apf;
>> +	int ret;
>> +
>> +	kvm_async_pf_add_slot(vcpu, work->arch.gfn);
>> +
>> +	ret = write_cache(vcpu, offsetof(struct kvm_vcpu_pv_apf_data, token),
>> +			  work->arch.token);
>> +	if (ret) {
>> +		kvm_err("%s: Error %d to write token (%d-%d %08x)\n",
> kvm_err's may be dropped

Ok. I will introduce a marco, which is disabled by default.

>> +			__func__, ret, kvm->userspace_pid,
>> +			vcpu->vcpu_idx, work->arch.token);
>> +		goto fail;
>> +	}
>> +
>> +	ret = write_cache(vcpu, offsetof(struct kvm_vcpu_pv_apf_data, reason),
>> +			  KVM_PV_REASON_PAGE_NOT_PRESENT);
>> +	if (ret) {
>> +		kvm_err("%s: Error %d to write reason (%d-%d %08x)\n",
>> +			__func__, ret, kvm->userspace_pid,
>> +			vcpu->vcpu_idx, work->arch.token);
>> +		goto fail;
>> +	}
>> +
>> +	apf->notpresent_pending = true;
>> +	apf->notpresent_token = work->arch.token;
>> +
>> +	return !kvm_sdei_inject(vcpu, apf->sdei_event_num, true);
>> +
>> +fail:
>> +	write_cache(vcpu, offsetof(struct kvm_vcpu_pv_apf_data, token), 0);
>> +	write_cache(vcpu, offsetof(struct kvm_vcpu_pv_apf_data, reason), 0);
>> +	kvm_async_pf_remove_slot(vcpu, work->arch.gfn);
>> +	return false;
>> +}
>> +
>> +void kvm_arch_async_pf_destroy_vcpu(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
>> +{
>> +	kfree(vcpu->arch.apf);
>> +	vcpu->arch.apf = NULL;
>> +}
>> diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/mmu.c b/arch/arm64/kvm/mmu.c
>> index e4038c5e931d..4ba78bd1f18c 100644
>> --- a/arch/arm64/kvm/mmu.c
>> +++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/mmu.c
>> @@ -914,6 +914,33 @@ static inline bool is_write_fault(unsigned int esr)
>>   	return esr_dabt_is_wnr(esr);
>>   }
>>   
>> +static bool try_async_pf(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, unsigned int esr,
>> +			 gpa_t gpa, gfn_t gfn, kvm_pfn_t *pfn,
>> +			 bool write, bool *writable, bool prefault)
>> +{
>> +	struct kvm_arch_async_pf_control *apf = vcpu->arch.apf;
>> +	struct kvm_memory_slot *slot = kvm_vcpu_gfn_to_memslot(vcpu, gfn);
>> +	bool async = false;
>> +
>> +	if (apf) {
> checking apf each time for a potential kacl of resource at vcpu creation
> look heavy to me.

Yep, As replied before, lets embedded the struct to kvm_vcpu_arch to
avoid the memory allocation. In that case, we needn't check it any
more.

>> +		/* Bail if *pfn has correct page */
> s/bail/bail out? Comment rather related to !async check.

Ok.

>> +		*pfn = __gfn_to_pfn_memslot(slot, gfn, false, &async,
>> +					    write, writable, NULL);
>> +		if (!async)
>> +			return false;
>> +
>> +		if (!prefault && kvm_arch_async_not_present_allowed(vcpu)) {
> x86 kvm_can_do_async_pf() naming look more straightforward than
> kvm_arch_async_not_present_allowed

I would keep the function name as I intend to have all function names
have prefix "kvm_arch_async". So lets rename it to kvm_arch_async_allowed()
in next revision.

>> +			if (kvm_async_pf_find_slot(vcpu, gfn) ||
> x86 has some trace points. You may envision to add some, maybe later on.

Yeah, lets ignore this one and we can add it in future.

>> +			    kvm_arch_setup_async_pf(vcpu, esr, gpa, gfn))
>> +				return true;
>> +		}
>> +	}
>> +
>> +	*pfn = __gfn_to_pfn_memslot(slot, gfn, false, NULL,
>> +				    write, writable, NULL);
>> +	return false;
>> +}
>> +
>>   int kvm_handle_user_mem_abort(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
>>   			      struct kvm_memory_slot *memslot,
>>   			      phys_addr_t fault_ipa,
>> @@ -1035,8 +1062,10 @@ int kvm_handle_user_mem_abort(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
>>   	 */
>>   	smp_rmb();
>>   
>> -	pfn = __gfn_to_pfn_memslot(memslot, gfn, false, NULL,
>> -				   write_fault, &writable, NULL);
>> +	if (try_async_pf(vcpu, esr, fault_ipa, gfn, &pfn,
>> +			 write_fault, &writable, prefault))
>> +		return 1;
>> +
>>   	if (pfn == KVM_PFN_ERR_HWPOISON) {
>>   		kvm_send_hwpoison_signal(hva, vma_shift);
>>   		return 0;
>>

Thanks,
Gavin

Powered by blists - more mailing lists