[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20220113100622.12783-4-farbere@amazon.com>
Date: Thu, 13 Jan 2022 10:06:21 +0000
From: Eliav Farber <farbere@...zon.com>
To: <bp@...en8.de>
CC: <mchehab@...nel.org>, <linux-edac@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <ronenk@...zon.com>,
<talel@...zon.com>, <hhhawa@...zon.com>, <jonnyc@...zon.com>,
<hanochu@...zon.com>, <farbere@...zon.com>
Subject: [PATCH 3/4] EDAC: Refactor edac_align_ptr() to use u8/u16/u32/u64 data types
Prefer well defined size variables, that are same in size across all
systems.
Signed-off-by: Eliav Farber <farbere@...zon.com>
---
drivers/edac/edac_mc.c | 17 ++++++-----------
1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/edac/edac_mc.c b/drivers/edac/edac_mc.c
index 8b9b86a7720a..3367bf997b73 100644
--- a/drivers/edac/edac_mc.c
+++ b/drivers/edac/edac_mc.c
@@ -250,18 +250,13 @@ void *edac_align_ptr(void **p, unsigned size, int n_elems)
* 'size'. Adjust 'p' so that its alignment is at least as
* stringent as what the compiler would provide for X and return
* the aligned result.
- * Here we assume that the alignment of a "long long" is the most
- * stringent alignment that the compiler will ever provide by default.
- * As far as I know, this is a reasonable assumption.
*/
- if (size > sizeof(long))
- align = sizeof(long long);
- else if (size > sizeof(int))
- align = sizeof(long);
- else if (size > sizeof(short))
- align = sizeof(int);
- else if (size > sizeof(char))
- align = sizeof(short);
+ if (size > sizeof(u32))
+ align = sizeof(u64);
+ else if (size > sizeof(u16))
+ align = sizeof(u32);
+ else if (size > sizeof(u8))
+ align = sizeof(u16);
else
return ptr;
--
2.32.0
Powered by blists - more mailing lists