[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20220113110941.GA2480843@anxtwsw-Precision-3640-Tower>
Date: Thu, 13 Jan 2022 19:09:41 +0800
From: Xin Ji <xji@...logixsemi.com>
To: Andrzej Hajda <andrzej.hajda@...el.com>,
Rex-BC Chen <rex-bc.chen@...iatek.com>,
chunkuang.hu@...nel.org, matthias.bgg@...il.com,
narmstrong@...libre.com, robert.foss@...aro.org, daniel@...ll.ch,
airlied@...ux.ie, p.zabel@...gutronix.de
Cc: jitao.shi@...iatek.com, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Project_Global_Chrome_Upstream_Group@...iatek.com
Subject: Re: [v8, PATCH 1/3] drm/dsi: transfer DSI HS packets ending at the
same time
Hi Andrzej Hajda,
On Thu, Jan 13, 2022 at 01:14:14AM +0100, Andrzej Hajda wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 12.01.2022 16:36, Rex-BC Chen wrote:
> > Since a HS transmission is composed of an arbitrary number
> > of bytes that may not be an integer multiple of lanes, some
> > lanes may run out of data before others.
> > (Defined in 6.1.3 of mipi_DSI_specification_v.01-02-00)
> >
> > However, for some DSI RX devices (for example, anx7625),
> > there is a limitation that packet number should be the same
> > on all DSI lanes. In other words, they need to end a HS at
> > the same time.
>
>
> Is it documented in anx7625 manual? Is it confirmed with hw team?
We have application note, and it is confirmed by designer, hw team.
>
> If not, how it was detected? Have you tried to find workaround for it by
> inspecting registers, maybe it is just matter of clock gating deferral,
> timings or sth similar ???.
>
> >
> > Because this limitation is for some specific DSI RX devices,
> > it is more reasonable to put the enable control in these
> > DSI RX drivers. If DSI TX driver knows the information,
> > they can adjust the setting for this situation.
> >
> > Therefore, add a flag to control this situation beacuse the
> > mipi DSI specification is not forbidden this situation.
>
>
> I am not sure what you mean here.
>
> I have an impression (according t 6.1.3 of spec) that devices should allow
> transmission of arbitrary number of bytes, so this is bug in hw/fw.
This is anx7625 bridge chip design limitation.
>
> The question if it can be fixed. If not patches are welcome.
>
>
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Jitao Shi <jitao.shi@...iatek.com>
> > Reviewed-by: Chun-Kuang Hu <chunkuang.hu@...nel.org>
> > ---
> > include/drm/drm_mipi_dsi.h | 2 ++
> > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
> >
> > diff --git a/include/drm/drm_mipi_dsi.h b/include/drm/drm_mipi_dsi.h
> > index 147e51b6d241..df4d15345326 100644
> > --- a/include/drm/drm_mipi_dsi.h
> > +++ b/include/drm/drm_mipi_dsi.h
> > @@ -177,6 +177,8 @@ struct mipi_dsi_device_info {
> > * @lp_rate: maximum lane frequency for low power mode in hertz, this should
> > * be set to the real limits of the hardware, zero is only accepted for
> > * legacy drivers
> > + * @hs_packet_end_aligned: transfer DSI HS packets ending at the same time
> > + * for all DSI lanes
> > */
> > struct mipi_dsi_device {
> > struct mipi_dsi_host *host;
> > @@ -189,6 +191,7 @@ struct mipi_dsi_device {
> > unsigned long mode_flags;
> > unsigned long hs_rate;
> > unsigned long lp_rate;
> > + bool hs_packet_end_aligned;
>
>
> Maybe it would be better to add another mode_flag.
mode_flag should be OK.
Thanks,
Xin
>
>
> Regards
>
> Andrzej
>
>
>
> > };
> > #define MIPI_DSI_MODULE_PREFIX "mipi-dsi:"
Powered by blists - more mailing lists