[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <YeAZtLFuRijGg6xP@zn.tnic>
Date: Thu, 13 Jan 2022 13:23:16 +0100
From: Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>
To: Tom Lendacky <thomas.lendacky@....com>
Cc: Brijesh Singh <brijesh.singh@....com>,
Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@...e.cz>, x86@...nel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, kvm@...r.kernel.org,
linux-efi@...r.kernel.org, platform-driver-x86@...r.kernel.org,
linux-coco@...ts.linux.dev, linux-mm@...ck.org,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, Joerg Roedel <jroedel@...e.de>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>, Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@...nel.org>,
Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>,
Sean Christopherson <seanjc@...gle.com>,
Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@...hat.com>,
Jim Mattson <jmattson@...gle.com>,
Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>,
Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>,
Sergio Lopez <slp@...hat.com>, Peter Gonda <pgonda@...gle.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Srinivas Pandruvada <srinivas.pandruvada@...ux.intel.com>,
David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>,
Dov Murik <dovmurik@...ux.ibm.com>,
Tobin Feldman-Fitzthum <tobin@....com>,
Michael Roth <michael.roth@....com>,
"Kirill A . Shutemov" <kirill@...temov.name>,
Andi Kleen <ak@...ux.intel.com>,
"Dr . David Alan Gilbert" <dgilbert@...hat.com>,
tony.luck@...el.com, marcorr@...gle.com,
sathyanarayanan.kuppuswamy@...ux.intel.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v8 20/40] x86/sev: Use SEV-SNP AP creation to start
secondary CPUs
On Wed, Jan 12, 2022 at 11:10:04AM -0600, Tom Lendacky wrote:
> On 1/12/22 10:33 AM, Brijesh Singh wrote:
> > On 12/31/21 9:36 AM, Borislav Petkov wrote:
> > > On Fri, Dec 10, 2021 at 09:43:12AM -0600, Brijesh Singh wrote:
>
> > > > + * an attempt was done to use the current VMSA with a running vCPU, a
> > > > + * #VMEXIT of that vCPU would wipe out all of the settings being done
> > > > + * here.
> > >
> > > I don't understand - this is waking up a CPU, how can it ever be a
> > > running vCPU which is using the current VMSA?!
>
> Yes, in general. My thought was that nothing is stopping a malicious
> hypervisor from performing a VMRUN on that vCPU and then the VMSA would be
> in use.
Ah, that's what you mean.
Ok, please extend that comment with it.
Thx.
--
Regards/Gruss,
Boris.
https://people.kernel.org/tglx/notes-about-netiquette
Powered by blists - more mailing lists