lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Thu, 13 Jan 2022 09:36:07 -0500
From:   Alyssa Rosenzweig <alyssa@...labora.com>
To:     Steven Price <steven.price@....com>
Cc:     Alyssa Rosenzweig <alyssa.rosenzweig@...labora.com>,
        dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org, Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>,
        Tomeu Vizoso <tomeu.vizoso@...labora.com>,
        David Airlie <airlied@...ux.ie>,
        Daniel Vetter <daniel@...ll.ch>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] drm/panfrost: Merge some feature lists

> >>> Note that this leaves some unmerged identical Bifrost feature lists, as
> >>> there are more features affecting Bifrost kernel space that we do not
> >>> yet hanlde.
> >>
> >> NIT: s/hanlde/handle/ ;)
> >>
> >> Do you have any features in mind that we're missing? The list looks very
> >> similar to the kbase one. And anyway it is simple enough to split again
> >> if we need to.
> > 
> > Just IDVS group size. For some reason I thought there were more when I
> > wrote that commit message. It's split to avoid churn in that patch.
> > 
> > Logically, this series should contain three patches, with the IDVS group
> > size enablement patch at the end. That was the series I wrote and
> > committed to disk. For review I split it out, since the feature clean-up
> > can land now, while the (RFC) IDVS group size patch needs
> > testing/benchmarking.
> > 
> 
> Ah, of course! That makes perfect sense, but somehow I hadn't managed to
> connect the two.
> 
> I've fixed the typo and pushed to drm-misc-next. And I'll wait for your
> benchmarking on IDVS. Do I get a few minutes break before the Valhall
> patches need reviewing? ;)

Thanks for the push :-) And yes, I'd like to get Valhall userspace up to
shape before trying to shovel code into the kernel ^^ There are some
errata that kbase works around that I haven't implemented workarounds
for yet, and I'd like to figure out how to hit those so I can test that
the workarounds are correct. (Particularly thinking of the dummy job
workaround / GPU hang issue)

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ