linux-kernel - Re: [RFC PATCH v2] PCI: Waiting command completed in get_port_device

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20220113145857.GA347384@bhelgaas>
Date:   Thu, 13 Jan 2022 08:58:57 -0600
From:   Bjorn Helgaas <helgaas@...nel.org>
To:     Yao Hongbo <yaohongbo@...ux.alibaba.com>
Cc:     bhelgaas@...gle.com, lukas@...ner.de,
        zhangliguang@...ux.alibaba.com,
        alikernel-developer@...ux.alibaba.com, linux-pci@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v2] PCI: Waiting command completed in
 get_port_device_capability()

On Thu, Jan 13, 2022 at 03:34:41PM +0800, Yao Hongbo wrote:
> 在 2022/1/13 上午2:01, Bjorn Helgaas 写道:
> > On Wed, Jan 12, 2022 at 03:33:25PM +0800, Yao Hongbo wrote:
> >> 在 2022/1/12 上午2:55, Bjorn Helgaas 写道:

> >>> What kind of system are you seeing the problem on?  It seems like it
> >>> should be safe to drop the HPIE and CCIE disable here for ACPI
> >>> systems.  And *likely* we could do the same for non-ACPI systems,
> >>> though I have no experience there.
> >>
> >> Hi, Bjorn
> >> Thanks for your comments.
> >>
> >> The problem occurs on ACPI systems.
> >>
> >>  acpi PNP0A08:00: _OSC: OS supports [ExtendedConfig ASPM ClockPM Segments MSI EDR HPX-Type3]
> >>  acpi PNP0A08:00: _OSC: platform does not support [SHPCHotplug AER LTR DPC]
> >>  acpi PNP0A08:00: _OSC: OS now controls [PCIeHotplug PME PCIeCapability]
> >>
> >> We clear HPIE and CCIE here because the firmware doesn't control
> >> Hotplug via __OSC.
> >>
> >> And on ACPI systems, we can also set pcie_ports=native, which will
> >> also encounter such problems.
> > 
> > What happens if you just drop that call like the patch below?
> > 
> > If that avoids the problem, then we can talk about whether we need to
> > worry about broken firmware in the non-ACPI or "pcie_ports=native"
> > cases.
> 
> Hi, Bjorn.
> This can avoid the problem currently.

Thanks for collecting that data!

> But i'm not sure if removing this code will introduce other problems,
> such as suprious hotplug before probing hotplug service.

I don't think spurious hotplug before probing the hotplug service is
an issue because there is always a window like this.  It's either
between:

  A: Handoff from firmware to OS
  B: get_port_device_capability()

or between:

  A: Handoff from firmware to OS
  C: pciehp initialization

Either way there is *some* window, and we have to decide how to deal
with it.  The exact duration is not very important.

Bjorn