linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] x86/entry_32: Fix segment exceptions

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <YeCDudla868Ipf++@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net>
Date:   Thu, 13 Jan 2022 20:55:37 +0100
From:   Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To:     Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>
Cc:     Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
        Sean Christopherson <seanjc@...gle.com>,
        kernel test robot <oliver.sang@...el.com>,
        Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@...hat.com>,
        LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, x86@...nel.org,
        lkp@...ts.01.org, lkp@...el.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86/entry_32: Fix segment exceptions

On Thu, Jan 13, 2022 at 10:54:39AM -0800, Andy Lutomirski wrote:
> On 1/12/22 07:42, Borislav Petkov wrote:
> > On Wed, Jan 12, 2022 at 11:55:41AM +0100, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> > > Full and proper patch below. Boris, if you could merge in x86/core that
> > > branch should then be ready for a pull req.
> > 
> > I've got this as the final version. Scream if something's wrong.
> 
> AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH!!!!!!!!!!!

:-)

> > +	/*
> > +	 * There is no _ASM_EXTABLE_TYPE_REG() for ASM, however since this is
> > +	 * ASM the registers are known and we can trivially hard-code them.
> > +	 */
> > +	_ASM_EXTABLE_TYPE(1b, 2b, EX_TYPE_POP_ZERO|EX_REG_DS)
> > +	_ASM_EXTABLE_TYPE(2b, 3b, EX_TYPE_POP_ZERO|EX_REG_ES)
> > +	_ASM_EXTABLE_TYPE(3b, 4b, EX_TYPE_POP_ZERO|EX_REG_FS)
> 
> Aside from POP_ZERO being a bit mystifying to a naive reader...
> 
> >   .endm
> >   .macro RESTORE_ALL_NMI cr3_reg:req pop=0
> > diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/extable_fixup_types.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/extable_fixup_types.h
> > index b5ab333e064a..503622627400 100644
> > --- a/arch/x86/include/asm/extable_fixup_types.h
> > +++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/extable_fixup_types.h
> > @@ -16,9 +16,16 @@
> >   #define EX_DATA_FLAG_SHIFT		12
> >   #define EX_DATA_IMM_SHIFT		16
> > +#define EX_DATA_REG(reg)		((reg) << EX_DATA_REG_SHIFT)
> >   #define EX_DATA_FLAG(flag)		((flag) << EX_DATA_FLAG_SHIFT)
> >   #define EX_DATA_IMM(imm)		((imm) << EX_DATA_IMM_SHIFT)
> > +/* segment regs */
> > +#define EX_REG_DS			EX_DATA_REG(8)
> > +#define EX_REG_ES			EX_DATA_REG(9)
> > +#define EX_REG_FS			EX_DATA_REG(10)
> 
> These three seem likely to work

On IRC Andrew also noted that these EX_REG_* things should be __i386__
only. Previosly when they lived as open-coded EX_DATA_REG() usage in
entry_32.S that was implied, but now ...