[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <YeCTsVCwEkT2N6kQ@google.com>
Date: Thu, 13 Jan 2022 21:03:45 +0000
From: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@...gle.com>
To: Zeng Guang <guang.zeng@...el.com>
Cc: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>,
Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@...hat.com>,
Wanpeng Li <wanpengli@...cent.com>,
Jim Mattson <jmattson@...gle.com>,
Joerg Roedel <joro@...tes.org>, kvm@...r.kernel.org,
Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>,
Tony Luck <tony.luck@...el.com>,
Kan Liang <kan.liang@...ux.intel.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
Kim Phillips <kim.phillips@....com>,
Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko@...nel.org>,
Jethro Beekman <jethro@...tanix.com>,
Kai Huang <kai.huang@...el.com>, x86@...nel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Robert Hu <robert.hu@...el.com>,
Gao Chao <chao.gao@...el.com>,
Robert Hoo <robert.hu@...ux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 4/8] KVM: VMX: dump_vmcs() reports
tertiary_exec_control field as well
On Fri, Dec 31, 2021, Zeng Guang wrote:
> From: Robert Hoo <robert.hu@...ux.intel.com>
>
> Add tertiary_exec_control field report in dump_vmcs()
>
> Signed-off-by: Robert Hoo <robert.hu@...ux.intel.com>
> Signed-off-by: Zeng Guang <guang.zeng@...el.com>
> ---
> arch/x86/kvm/vmx/vmx.c | 9 +++++++--
> 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/vmx.c b/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/vmx.c
> index fb0f600368c6..5716db9704c0 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/vmx.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/vmx.c
> @@ -5729,6 +5729,7 @@ void dump_vmcs(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
> struct vcpu_vmx *vmx = to_vmx(vcpu);
> u32 vmentry_ctl, vmexit_ctl;
> u32 cpu_based_exec_ctrl, pin_based_exec_ctrl, secondary_exec_control;
> + u64 tertiary_exec_control = 0;
> unsigned long cr4;
> int efer_slot;
>
> @@ -5746,6 +5747,9 @@ void dump_vmcs(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
> if (cpu_has_secondary_exec_ctrls())
> secondary_exec_control = vmcs_read32(SECONDARY_VM_EXEC_CONTROL);
Gah, this (not your) code is silly. I had to go look at the full source to see
that secondary_exec_control isn't accessed uninitialized...
Can you opportunistically tweak it to the below, and use the same patter for the
tertiary controls?
if (cpu_has_secondary_exec_ctrls())
secondary_exec_control = vmcs_read32(SECONDARY_VM_EXEC_CONTROL);
else
secondary_exec_control = 0;
>
> + if (cpu_has_tertiary_exec_ctrls())
> + tertiary_exec_control = vmcs_read64(TERTIARY_VM_EXEC_CONTROL);
> +
> pr_err("VMCS %p, last attempted VM-entry on CPU %d\n",
> vmx->loaded_vmcs->vmcs, vcpu->arch.last_vmentry_cpu);
> pr_err("*** Guest State ***\n");
> @@ -5844,8 +5848,9 @@ void dump_vmcs(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
> vmx_dump_msrs("host autoload", &vmx->msr_autoload.host);
>
> pr_err("*** Control State ***\n");
> - pr_err("PinBased=%08x CPUBased=%08x SecondaryExec=%08x\n",
> - pin_based_exec_ctrl, cpu_based_exec_ctrl, secondary_exec_control);
> + pr_err("PinBased=0x%08x CPUBased=0x%08x SecondaryExec=0x%08x TertiaryExec=0x%016llx\n",
> + pin_based_exec_ctrl, cpu_based_exec_ctrl, secondary_exec_control,
> + tertiary_exec_control);
Can you provide a sample dump? It's hard to visualize the output, e.g. I'm worried
this will be overly log and harder to read than putting tertiary controls on their
own line.
> pr_err("EntryControls=%08x ExitControls=%08x\n", vmentry_ctl, vmexit_ctl);
> pr_err("ExceptionBitmap=%08x PFECmask=%08x PFECmatch=%08x\n",
> vmcs_read32(EXCEPTION_BITMAP),
> --
> 2.27.0
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists