[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CACGkMEsqY5RHL=9=iny6xRVs_=EdACUCfX-Rmpq+itpdoT_rrg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 14 Jan 2022 14:18:01 +0800
From: Jason Wang <jasowang@...hat.com>
To: Stefano Garzarella <sgarzare@...hat.com>
Cc: virtualization <virtualization@...ts.linux-foundation.org>,
netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@...hat.com>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
kvm <kvm@...r.kernel.org>, "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH] vhost: cache avail index in vhost_enable_notify()
On Thu, Jan 13, 2022 at 10:57 PM Stefano Garzarella <sgarzare@...hat.com> wrote:
>
> In vhost_enable_notify() we enable the notifications and we read
> the avail index to check if new buffers have become available in
> the meantime. In this case, the device would go to re-read avail
> index to access the descriptor.
>
> As we already do in other place, we can cache the value in `avail_idx`
> and compare it with `last_avail_idx` to check if there are new
> buffers available.
>
> Signed-off-by: Stefano Garzarella <sgarzare@...hat.com>
Patch looks fine but I guess we won't get performance improvement
since it doesn't save any userspace/VM memory access?
Thanks
> ---
> drivers/vhost/vhost.c | 3 ++-
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/vhost/vhost.c b/drivers/vhost/vhost.c
> index 59edb5a1ffe2..07363dff559e 100644
> --- a/drivers/vhost/vhost.c
> +++ b/drivers/vhost/vhost.c
> @@ -2543,8 +2543,9 @@ bool vhost_enable_notify(struct vhost_dev *dev, struct vhost_virtqueue *vq)
> &vq->avail->idx, r);
> return false;
> }
> + vq->avail_idx = vhost16_to_cpu(vq, avail_idx);
>
> - return vhost16_to_cpu(vq, avail_idx) != vq->avail_idx;
> + return vq->avail_idx != vq->last_avail_idx;
> }
> EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(vhost_enable_notify);
>
> --
> 2.31.1
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists