linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 2/5] platform: surface: Propagate ACPI Dependency

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <87czku4z2i.fsf@kernel.org>
Date:   Fri, 14 Jan 2022 08:20:41 +0200
From:   Felipe Balbi <balbi@...nel.org>
To:     Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org>
Cc:     Jarrett Schultz <jaschultzms@...il.com>,
        Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
        Andy Gross <agross@...nel.org>,
        Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@...aro.org>,
        Hans de Goede <hdegoede@...hat.com>,
        Mark Gross <markgross@...nel.org>,
        Maximilian Luz <luzmaximilian@...il.com>,
        linux-arm-msm <linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org>,
        platform-driver-x86@...r.kernel.org,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        "open list:OPEN FIRMWARE AND FLATTENED DEVICE TREE BINDINGS" 
        <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
        Jarrett Schultz <jaschultz@...rosoft.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/5] platform: surface: Propagate ACPI Dependency


Hi,

Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org> writes:
> Hi Jarrett,
>
> On Mon, Dec 6, 2021 at 4:03 PM Jarrett Schultz <jaschultzms@...il.com> wrote:
>> Since the Surface XBL Driver does not depend on ACPI, the
>> platform/surface directory as a whole no longer depends on ACPI. With
>> respect to this, the ACPI dependency is moved into each config that depends
>> on ACPI individually.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Jarrett Schultz <jaschultz@...rosoft.com>
>
> Thanks for your patch, which is now commit 272479928172edf0 ("platform:
> surface: Propagate ACPI Dependency").
>
>> --- a/drivers/platform/surface/Kconfig
>> +++ b/drivers/platform/surface/Kconfig
>> @@ -5,7 +5,6 @@
>>
>>  menuconfig SURFACE_PLATFORMS
>>         bool "Microsoft Surface Platform-Specific Device Drivers"
>> -       depends on ACPI
>>         default y
>>         help
>>           Say Y here to get to see options for platform-specific device drivers
>
> Without any dependency, all users configuring a kernel are now asked
> about this. Is there any other platform dependency that can be used
> instead?

there's probably no symbol that would be true for x86 and arm64 while
being false for everything else. Any ideas?

In any case, what's the problem of being asked about a new symbol? That
happens all the time whenever new drivers are merged, right?

-- 
balbi