linux-kernel - Re: [RFC PATCH v2 03/13] module: Move livepatch support to a separate file

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Fri, 14 Jan 2022 09:14:00 +0000
From:   Aaron Tomlin <atomlin@...hat.com>
To:     Petr Mladek <pmladek@...e.com>
Cc:     mcgrof@...nel.org, cl@...ux.com, mbenes@...e.cz,
        akpm@...ux-foundation.org, jeyu@...nel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-modules@...r.kernel.org,
        atomlin@...mlin.com, ghalat@...hat.com, allen.lkml@...il.com,
        live-patching@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v2 03/13] module: Move livepatch support to a
 separate file

On Wed 2022-01-12 17:53 +0100, Petr Mladek wrote:
> It would be better to have the two variants close each other. I mean
> to have it somewhere like:
> 
> #ifdef CONFIG_LIVEPATCH
> 
>    variant A
> 
> #else
> 
>    variant B
> 
> #endif

Petr,

I agree. I'll incorporate this approach into RFC PATCH v3.


Kind regards,

-- 
Aaron Tomlin