linux-kernel - Re: GPL-1.0-licensed code for files drivers/clk/mediatek/clk-mt7986* included with commit ec97d23c8e22 ("clk: mediatek: add mt7986 clock support")

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20220114014346.947F3C36AE3@smtp.kernel.org>
Date:   Thu, 13 Jan 2022 17:43:45 -0800
From:   Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...nel.org>
To:     Lukas Bulwahn <lukas.bulwahn@...il.com>,
        Ryder Lee <ryder.lee@...nel.org>,
        Sam Shih <sam.shih@...iatek.com>
Cc:     Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
        linux-spdx@...r.kernel.org,
        kernel-janitors <kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: GPL-1.0-licensed code for files drivers/clk/mediatek/clk-mt7986* included with commit ec97d23c8e22 ("clk: mediatek: add mt7986 clock support")

Quoting Sam Shih (2022-01-10 04:12:57)
> Hi Luka/Stephen,
> 
> This is my mistake, I seem to use an old license header on it.
> Just like "clk-mt7986-eth.c" in the same patch series,
> 
> 
> https://lore.kernel.org/all/20211217121148.6753-4-sam.shih@mediatek.com/
> 
> I intend to license "clk-mt7986-apmixed.c", "clk-mt7986-infracfg.c",
> and "clk-mt7986-topckgen" under the kernel's standard GPL-2.0.
> 
> Should I need to resend this patch?
> Or I can just send a follow-up patch to fix it?
> 

Please send a followup to fix it.