[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <YeFMPNnCpiw9fs7e@linutronix.de>
Date: Fri, 14 Jan 2022 11:11:08 +0100
From: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@...utronix.de>
To: Valentin Schneider <valentin.schneider@....com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Abhijeet Dharmapurikar <adharmap@...cinc.com>,
Uwe Kleine-König
<u.kleine-koenig@...gutronix.de>,
Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@....com>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@...aro.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@...hat.com>,
Daniel Bristot de Oliveira <bristot@...hat.com>,
Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 2/2] sched/tracing: Add TASK_RTLOCK_WAIT to
TASK_REPORT
On 2021-11-29 12:36:01 [+0000], Valentin Schneider wrote:
> TASK_RTLOCK_WAIT currently isn't part of TASK_REPORT, thus a task blocking
> on an rtlock will appear as having a task state == 0, IOW TASK_RUNNING.
>
> The actual state is saved in p->saved_state, but reading it after reading
> p->__state has a few issues:
> o that could still be TASK_RUNNING in the case of e.g. rt_spin_lock
> o ttwu_state_match() might have changed that to TASK_RUNNING
>
> Add TASK_RTLOCK_WAIT to TASK_REPORT.
>
> Signed-off-by: Valentin Schneider <valentin.schneider@....com>
We used to have the D state which was used in the locked case and was
sufficient. With the rework to TASK_RTLOCK_WAIT (which made other things
easier) we lost that. It makes debuging/ looking into the system more
obvious or does not hide things so why not.
Reviewed-by: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@...utronix.de>
Sebastian
Powered by blists - more mailing lists