linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 14/17] riscv: dts: microchip: add fpga fabric section to icicle kit

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <5b5deada-b9d5-5e35-7876-f5b94e792cf2@microchip.com>
Date:   Fri, 14 Jan 2022 13:35:52 +0000
From:   <Conor.Dooley@...rochip.com>
To:     <geert@...ux-m68k.org>, <robh+dt@...nel.org>
CC:     <linus.walleij@...aro.org>, <bgolaszewski@...libre.com>,
        <jassisinghbrar@...il.com>, <paul.walmsley@...ive.com>,
        <palmer@...belt.com>, <aou@...s.berkeley.edu>,
        <a.zummo@...ertech.it>, <alexandre.belloni@...tlin.com>,
        <broonie@...nel.org>, <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        <thierry.reding@...il.com>, <u.kleine-koenig@...gutronix.de>,
        <lee.jones@...aro.org>, <linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org>,
        <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        <linux-i2c@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-pwm@...r.kernel.org>,
        <linux-riscv@...ts.infradead.org>, <linux-crypto@...r.kernel.org>,
        <linux-rtc@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-spi@...r.kernel.org>,
        <linux-usb@...r.kernel.org>, <krzysztof.kozlowski@...onical.com>,
        <bin.meng@...driver.com>, <heiko@...ech.de>,
        <Lewis.Hanly@...rochip.com>, <Daire.McNamara@...rochip.com>,
        <Ivan.Griffin@...rochip.com>, <atish.patra@....com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 14/17] riscv: dts: microchip: add fpga fabric section
 to icicle kit

On 17/12/2021 13:43, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> EXTERNAL EMAIL: Do not click links or open attachments unless you know the content is safe
> 
> Hi Conor,
> 
> On Fri, Dec 17, 2021 at 10:33 AM <conor.dooley@...rochip.com> wrote:
>> From: Conor Dooley <conor.dooley@...rochip.com>
>>
>> Split the device tree for the Microchip MPFS into two sections by adding
>> microchip-mpfs-fabric.dtsi, which contains peripherals contained in the
>> FPGA fabric.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Conor Dooley <conor.dooley@...rochip.com>
> 
> Thanks for your patch!
> 
>> --- /dev/null
>> +++ b/arch/riscv/boot/dts/microchip/microchip-mpfs-fabric.dtsi
>> @@ -0,0 +1,13 @@
>> +// SPDX-License-Identifier: (GPL-2.0 OR MIT)
>> +/* Copyright (c) 2020-2021 Microchip Technology Inc */
>> +
>> +/ {
>> +       corePWM0: pwm@...00000 {
>> +               compatible = "microchip,corepwm";
>> +               reg = <0x0 0x41000000 0x0 0xF0>;
>> +               microchip,sync-update = /bits/ 8 <0>;
>> +               #pwm-cells = <2>;
>> +               clocks = <&clkcfg CLK_FIC3>;
>> +               status = "disabled";
>> +       };
> 
> I'm wondering if these should be grouped under a "fabric" subnode,
> like we have an "soc" subnode for on-SoC devices? Rob?
I was about to send v3 but I realised nothing happened with this.
I will leave it as a dtsi and submit, but I'll be all ears if Rob wants 
something else.

> 
> BTW, do you already have a naming plan for different revisions of
> FPGA fabric cores?
> 
> Gr{oetje,eeting}s,
> 
>                          Geert
> 
> --
> Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@...ux-m68k.org
> 
> In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But
> when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that.
>                                  -- Linus Torvalds
>