[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <0d9e38ad27cf0bebc73e104d8ea462e7cf319e40.camel@toradex.com>
Date: Fri, 14 Jan 2022 13:39:27 +0000
From: Marcel Ziswiler <marcel.ziswiler@...adex.com>
To: "linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
"stefan.wahren@...e.com" <stefan.wahren@...e.com>
CC: "enric.balletbo@...labora.com" <enric.balletbo@...labora.com>,
"marek.vasut@...il.com" <marek.vasut@...il.com>,
"agx@...xcpu.org" <agx@...xcpu.org>,
"krzk@...nel.org" <krzk@...nel.org>,
"biju.das.jz@...renesas.com" <biju.das.jz@...renesas.com>,
"olof@...om.net" <olof@...om.net>, "arnd@...db.de" <arnd@...db.de>,
"catalin.marinas@....com" <catalin.marinas@....com>,
"bjorn.andersson@...aro.org" <bjorn.andersson@...aro.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"geert+renesas@...der.be" <geert+renesas@...der.be>,
"shawnguo@...nel.org" <shawnguo@...nel.org>,
"will@...nel.org" <will@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 05/14] arm64: defconfig: build imx-sdma as a module
Hi Stefan
On Thu, 2022-01-13 at 19:42 +0100, Stefan Wahren wrote:
> Hi Marcel,
>
> Am 07.01.22 um 19:03 schrieb Marcel Ziswiler:
> > From: Marcel Ziswiler <marcel.ziswiler@...adex.com>
> >
> > This avoids firmware load error and sysfs fallback reported as follows:
> >
> > [ 0.199448] imx-sdma 302c0000.dma-controller: Direct firmware load
> > for imx/sdma/sdma-imx7d.bin failed with error -2
> > [ 0.199487] imx-sdma 302c0000.dma-controller: Falling back to sysfs
> > fallback for: imx/sdma/sdma-imx7d.bin
>
> unfortunately this isn't an explanation why this solve the issue. It
> looks like that the SDMA firmware is not available for the kernel. Build
> the driver as a module hide the issue and just load it if the rootfs is
> available.
Well, it seems to default to some built-in firmware which, unfortunately, might have some severe known errata
anyway.
> What makes you sure that the driver is not critical for other boards
> during boot?
That is a good question. I remember that there was some more discussion back when I proposed the same change
for imx_v6_v7_defconfig in the 32-bit Arm world. While nobody was able to fully answer it all it did get
accepted by the i.MX maintainer back in the day [1]. I will mention that in v2.
[1] https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20210920144938.314588-6-marcel@ziswiler.com/
Thanks for your review.
> Best regards
>
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Marcel Ziswiler <marcel.ziswiler@...adex.com>
> > ---
> >
> > arch/arm64/configs/defconfig | 2 +-
> > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/arch/arm64/configs/defconfig b/arch/arm64/configs/defconfig
> > index 3c8106c5776a..a18785a827dc 100644
> > --- a/arch/arm64/configs/defconfig
> > +++ b/arch/arm64/configs/defconfig
> > @@ -915,7 +915,7 @@ CONFIG_DMADEVICES=y
> > CONFIG_DMA_BCM2835=y
> > CONFIG_DMA_SUN6I=m
> > CONFIG_FSL_EDMA=y
> > -CONFIG_IMX_SDMA=y
> > +CONFIG_IMX_SDMA=m
> > CONFIG_K3_DMA=y
> > CONFIG_MV_XOR=y
> > CONFIG_MV_XOR_V2=y
Cheers
Marcel
Powered by blists - more mailing lists