[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CADnq5_OVB-P2dE=ZZRXC2QsL6tFTXbZoaPw3FmK6XHECvZgZZg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 14 Jan 2022 09:58:27 -0500
From: Alex Deucher <alexdeucher@...il.com>
To: Lukas Fink <lukas.fink1@...il.com>
Cc: "Deucher, Alexander" <alexander.deucher@....com>,
Christian Koenig <christian.koenig@....com>,
xinhui pan <Xinhui.Pan@....com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
amd-gfx list <amd-gfx@...ts.freedesktop.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] drm/amdgpu: Fix rejecting Tahiti GPUs
On Fri, Jan 14, 2022 at 9:56 AM Alex Deucher <alexdeucher@...il.com> wrote:
>
> On Fri, Jan 14, 2022 at 3:27 AM Lukas Fink <lukas.fink1@...il.com> wrote:
> >
> > eb4fd29afd4a ("drm/amdgpu: bind to any 0x1002 PCI diplay class device") added
> > generic bindings to amdgpu so that that it binds to all display class devices
> > with VID 0x1002 and then rejects those in amdgpu_pci_probe.
> >
> > Unfortunately it reuses a driver_data value of 0 to detect those new bindings,
> > which is already used to denote CHIP_TAHITI ASICs.
> >
> > The driver_data value given to those new bindings was changed in
> > dd0761fd24ea1 ("drm/amdgpu: set CHIP_IP_DISCOVERY as the asic type by default")
> > to CHIP_IP_DISCOVERY (=36), but it seems that the check in amdgpu_pci_probe
> > was forgotten to be changed. Therefore, it still rejects Tahiti GPUs.
> >
> > Link: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/amd/-/issues/1860
> > Fixes: eb4fd29afd4a ("drm/amdgpu: bind to any 0x1002 PCI diplay class device")
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Lukas Fink <lukas.fink1@...il.com>
> > ---
> > drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_drv.c | 2 +-
> > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_drv.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_drv.c
> > index 9ec58bf74012..224d073022ac 100644
> > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_drv.c
> > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_drv.c
> > @@ -1903,7 +1903,7 @@ static int amdgpu_pci_probe(struct pci_dev *pdev,
> > return -ENODEV;
> > }
> >
> > - if (flags == 0) {
> > + if (flags == CHIP_IP_DISCOVERY) {
> > DRM_INFO("Unsupported asic. Remove me when IP discovery init is in place.\n");
> > return -ENODEV;
> > }
>
> Thanks. Actually this entire check can be removed at this point. The
> IP discovery support is in place. I'll send a patch.
Actually, I'll take this patch and then send a patch to remove it on
top of that. Thanks for fixing this.
Alex
>
> Alex
>
>
> > --
> > 2.34.1
> >
Powered by blists - more mailing lists