[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20220114225659.D5D79C36AE9@smtp.kernel.org>
Date: Fri, 14 Jan 2022 14:56:58 -0800
From: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...nel.org>
To: Pali Rohár <pali@...nel.org>
Cc: Gregory CLEMENT <gregory.clement@...tlin.com>,
Michael Turquette <mturquette@...libre.com>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>,
Sebastian Hesselbarth <sebastian.hesselbarth@...il.com>,
Vladimir Vid <vladimir.vid@...tura.hr>,
Marek Behún <kabel@...nel.org>,
linux-clk@...r.kernel.org, linux-serial@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 0/6] serial: mvebu-uart: Support for higher baudrates
Quoting Pali Rohár (2022-01-14 02:51:00)
> Hello Stephen!
>
> On Friday 17 December 2021 18:23:00 Gregory CLEMENT wrote:
> > Hello Pali,
> >
> > > On Thursday 30 September 2021 11:58:32 Pali Rohár wrote:
> > >> This patch series add support for baudrates higher than 230400 on
> > >> Marvell Armada 37xx boards.
> > >
> > > Stephen, Gregory, are there any issues with this patch series?
> >
> > I am not found of these changes but let's apply it as I didn't take time
> > to do a better review.
> >
> > However I can't apply the dt part if the driver is not merged.
>
> Stephen, are there any issues with driver (non-DT) part changes in this
> patch series? If not, could you please merge them? This patch series is
> here on the list since September without any request for change...
Oh I missed this thread. I thought it was going to be resent.
>
> We would really like to see support for higher baudrates for Armada 3720
> platforms in mainline kernel.
If we're adding new support why can't we break with backwards
compatibility for the binding and do it a different way?
Powered by blists - more mailing lists