| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <CAEf4Bzax8aWb68favtYGUUYS0BshMAJNy+0Mj0GHNXxDZY2KCA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 14 Jan 2022 18:53:43 -0800
From: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii.nakryiko@...il.com>
To: "zhudi (E)" <zhudi2@...wei.com>
Cc: Jakub Sitnicki <jakub@...udflare.com>,
Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>,
Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@...nel.org>, Martin Lau <kafai@...com>,
Song Liu <songliubraving@...com>, Yonghong Song <yhs@...com>,
john fastabend <john.fastabend@...il.com>,
KP Singh <kpsingh@...nel.org>, bpf <bpf@...r.kernel.org>,
open list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"Luzhihao (luzhihao, Euler)" <luzhihao@...wei.com>,
"Chenxiang (EulerOS)" <rose.chen@...wei.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf-next v5 1/2] bpf: support BPF_PROG_QUERY for progs
attached to sockmap
On Fri, Jan 14, 2022 at 6:38 PM zhudi (E) <zhudi2@...wei.com> wrote:
>
> > On Thu, Jan 13, 2022 at 8:15 AM Jakub Sitnicki <jakub@...udflare.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > On Thu, Jan 13, 2022 at 10:00 AM CET, Di Zhu wrote:
> > > > Right now there is no way to query whether BPF programs are
> > > > attached to a sockmap or not.
> > > >
> > > > we can use the standard interface in libbpf to query, such as:
> > > > bpf_prog_query(mapFd, BPF_SK_SKB_STREAM_PARSER, 0, NULL, ...);
> > > > the mapFd is the fd of sockmap.
> > > >
> > > > Signed-off-by: Di Zhu <zhudi2@...wei.com>
> > > > Acked-by: Yonghong Song <yhs@...com>
> > > > ---
> > > > include/linux/bpf.h | 9 +++++
> > > > kernel/bpf/syscall.c | 5 +++
> > > > net/core/sock_map.c | 78
> > ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----
> > > > 3 files changed, 85 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
> > > >
> > > > diff --git a/include/linux/bpf.h b/include/linux/bpf.h
> > > > index 6e947cd91152..c4ca14c9f838 100644
> > > > --- a/include/linux/bpf.h
> > > > +++ b/include/linux/bpf.h
> > > > @@ -2071,6 +2071,9 @@ int bpf_prog_test_run_syscall(struct bpf_prog
> > *prog,
> > > > int sock_map_get_from_fd(const union bpf_attr *attr, struct bpf_prog
> > *prog);
> > > > int sock_map_prog_detach(const union bpf_attr *attr, enum bpf_prog_type
> > ptype);
> > > > int sock_map_update_elem_sys(struct bpf_map *map, void *key, void
> > *value, u64 flags);
> > > > +int sock_map_bpf_prog_query(const union bpf_attr *attr,
> > > > + union bpf_attr __user *uattr);
> > > > +
> > > > void sock_map_unhash(struct sock *sk);
> > > > void sock_map_close(struct sock *sk, long timeout);
> > > > #else
> > > > @@ -2124,6 +2127,12 @@ static inline int
> > sock_map_update_elem_sys(struct bpf_map *map, void *key, void
> > > > {
> > > > return -EOPNOTSUPP;
> > > > }
> > > > +
> > > > +static inline int sock_map_bpf_prog_query(const union bpf_attr *attr,
> > > > + union bpf_attr __user
> > *uattr)
> > > > +{
> > > > + return -EINVAL;
> > > > +}
> > > > #endif /* CONFIG_BPF_SYSCALL */
> > > > #endif /* CONFIG_NET && CONFIG_BPF_SYSCALL */
> > > >
> > > > diff --git a/kernel/bpf/syscall.c b/kernel/bpf/syscall.c
> > > > index fa4505f9b611..9e0631f091a6 100644
> > > > --- a/kernel/bpf/syscall.c
> > > > +++ b/kernel/bpf/syscall.c
> > > > @@ -3318,6 +3318,11 @@ static int bpf_prog_query(const union bpf_attr
> > *attr,
> > > > case BPF_FLOW_DISSECTOR:
> > > > case BPF_SK_LOOKUP:
> > > > return netns_bpf_prog_query(attr, uattr);
> > > > + case BPF_SK_SKB_STREAM_PARSER:
> > > > + case BPF_SK_SKB_STREAM_VERDICT:
> > > > + case BPF_SK_MSG_VERDICT:
> > > > + case BPF_SK_SKB_VERDICT:
> > > > + return sock_map_bpf_prog_query(attr, uattr);
> > > > default:
> > > > return -EINVAL;
> > > > }
> > > > diff --git a/net/core/sock_map.c b/net/core/sock_map.c
> > > > index 1827669eedd6..a424f51041ca 100644
> > > > --- a/net/core/sock_map.c
> > > > +++ b/net/core/sock_map.c
> > > > @@ -1416,38 +1416,50 @@ static struct sk_psock_progs
> > *sock_map_progs(struct bpf_map *map)
> > > > return NULL;
> > > > }
> > > >
> > > > -static int sock_map_prog_update(struct bpf_map *map, struct bpf_prog
> > *prog,
> > > > - struct bpf_prog *old, u32 which)
> > > > +static int sock_map_prog_lookup(struct bpf_map *map, struct bpf_prog
> > ***pprog,
> > > > + u32 which)
> > > > {
> > > > struct sk_psock_progs *progs = sock_map_progs(map);
> > > > - struct bpf_prog **pprog;
> > > >
> > > > if (!progs)
> > > > return -EOPNOTSUPP;
> > > >
> > > > switch (which) {
> > > > case BPF_SK_MSG_VERDICT:
> > > > - pprog = &progs->msg_parser;
> > > > + *pprog = &progs->msg_parser;
> > > > break;
> > > > #if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_BPF_STREAM_PARSER)
> > > > case BPF_SK_SKB_STREAM_PARSER:
> > > > - pprog = &progs->stream_parser;
> > > > + *pprog = &progs->stream_parser;
> > > > break;
> > > > #endif
> > > > case BPF_SK_SKB_STREAM_VERDICT:
> > > > if (progs->skb_verdict)
> > > > return -EBUSY;
> > > > - pprog = &progs->stream_verdict;
> > > > + *pprog = &progs->stream_verdict;
> > > > break;
> > > > case BPF_SK_SKB_VERDICT:
> > > > if (progs->stream_verdict)
> > > > return -EBUSY;
> > > > - pprog = &progs->skb_verdict;
> > > > + *pprog = &progs->skb_verdict;
> > > > break;
> > > > default:
> > > > return -EOPNOTSUPP;
> > > > }
> > > >
> > > > + return 0;
> > > > +}
> > > > +
> > > > +static int sock_map_prog_update(struct bpf_map *map, struct bpf_prog
> > *prog,
> > > > + struct bpf_prog *old, u32 which)
> > > > +{
> > > > + struct bpf_prog **pprog;
> > > > + int ret;
> > > > +
> > > > + ret = sock_map_prog_lookup(map, &pprog, which);
> > > > + if (ret)
> > > > + return ret;
> > > > +
> > > > if (old)
> > > > return psock_replace_prog(pprog, prog, old);
> > > >
> > > > @@ -1455,6 +1467,58 @@ static int sock_map_prog_update(struct bpf_map
> > *map, struct bpf_prog *prog,
> > > > return 0;
> > > > }
> > > >
> > > > +int sock_map_bpf_prog_query(const union bpf_attr *attr,
> > > > + union bpf_attr __user *uattr)
> > > > +{
> > > > + __u32 __user *prog_ids = u64_to_user_ptr(attr->query.prog_ids);
> > > > + u32 prog_cnt = 0, flags = 0, ufd = attr->target_fd;
> > > > + struct bpf_prog **pprog;
> > > > + struct bpf_prog *prog;
> > > > + struct bpf_map *map;
> > > > + struct fd f;
> > > > + u32 id = 0;
> > > > + int ret;
> > > > +
> > > > + if (attr->query.query_flags)
> > > > + return -EINVAL;
> > > > +
> > > > + f = fdget(ufd);
> > > > + map = __bpf_map_get(f);
> > > > + if (IS_ERR(map))
> > > > + return PTR_ERR(map);
> > > > +
> > > > + rcu_read_lock();
> > > > +
> > > > + ret = sock_map_prog_lookup(map, &pprog, attr->query.attach_type);
> > > > + if (ret)
> > > > + goto end;
> > > > +
> > > > + prog = *pprog;
> > > > + prog_cnt = !prog ? 0 : 1;
> > > > +
> > > > + if (!attr->query.prog_cnt || !prog_ids || !prog_cnt)
> > > > + goto end;
> > > > +
> > > > + id = prog->aux->id;
> > >
> > > ^ This looks like a concurrent read/write.
> >
> > You mean that bpf_prog_load() might be setting it in a different
> > thread? I think ID is allocated and fixed before prog FD is available
> > to the user-space, so prog->aux->id is set in stone and immutable in
> > that regard.
>
> What we're talking about here is that bpf_prog_free_id() will write the id
> identifier synchronously.
Hm.. let's say bpf_prog_free_id() happens right after we read id 123.
It's impossible to distinguish that from reading valid ID (that's not
yet freed), returning it to user-space and before user-space can do
anything about that this program and it's ID are freed. User-space
either way will get an ID that's not valid anymore. I don't see any
use of READ_ONCE/WRITE_ONCE with prog->aux->id, which is why I was
asking what changed.
>
> >
> > >
> > > Would wrap with READ_ONCE() and corresponding WRITE_ONCE() in
> > > bpf_prog_free_id(). See [1] for rationale.
> > >
> > > [1]
> > https://github.com/google/kernel-sanitizers/blob/master/other/READ_WRITE_O
> > NCE.md
> > >
> > > > +
> > > > + /* we do not hold the refcnt, the bpf prog may be released
> > > > + * asynchronously and the id would be set to 0.
> > > > + */
> > > > + if (id == 0)
> > > > + prog_cnt = 0;
> > > > +
> > > > +end:
> > > > + rcu_read_unlock();
> > > > +
> > > > + if (copy_to_user(&uattr->query.attach_flags, &flags, sizeof(flags)) ||
> > > > + (id != 0 && copy_to_user(prog_ids, &id, sizeof(u32))) ||
> > > > + copy_to_user(&uattr->query.prog_cnt, &prog_cnt,
> > sizeof(prog_cnt)))
> > > > + ret = -EFAULT;
> > > > +
> > > > + fdput(f);
> > > > + return ret;
> > > > +}
> > > > +
> > > > static void sock_map_unlink(struct sock *sk, struct sk_psock_link *link)
> > > > {
> > > > switch (link->map->map_type) {
Powered by blists - more mailing lists