linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v8 11/11] clk: scmi: Support atomic clock enable/disable API

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Fri, 14 Jan 2022 15:08:37 -0800
From:   Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...nel.org>
To:     Cristian Marussi <cristian.marussi@....com>,
        linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     sudeep.holla@....com, james.quinlan@...adcom.com,
        Jonathan.Cameron@...wei.com, f.fainelli@...il.com,
        etienne.carriere@...aro.org, vincent.guittot@...aro.org,
        souvik.chakravarty@....com, cristian.marussi@....com,
        Michael Turquette <mturquette@...libre.com>,
        linux-clk@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v8 11/11] clk: scmi: Support atomic clock enable/disable API

Quoting Cristian Marussi (2021-12-20 11:56:46)
> Support also atomic enable/disable clk_ops beside the bare non-atomic one
> (prepare/unprepare) when the underlying SCMI transport is configured to
> support atomic transactions for synchronous commands.
> 
> Cc: Michael Turquette <mturquette@...libre.com>
> Cc: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...nel.org>
> Cc: linux-clk@...r.kernel.org
> Signed-off-by: Cristian Marussi <cristian.marussi@....com>
> ---
> NOTE THAT STILL THERE'S NO FINE GRAIN CONTROL OVER SELECTION
> OF WHICH CLOCK DEVICES CAN SUPPORT ATOMIC AND WHICH SHOULD NOT
> BASED ON CLOCK DEVICES ENABLE LATENCY.
> THIS HAS STILL TO BE ADDED IN SCMI PROTOCOL SPEC.

Why are you yelling on the internet? :-) I guess I need to ack this.

Acked-by: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...nel.org>