lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Sat, 15 Jan 2022 07:59:57 +0100
From:   Takashi Iwai <tiwai@...e.de>
To:     Hans de Goede <hdegoede@...hat.com>
Cc:     "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>,
        Lucas Tanure <tanureal@...nsource.cirrus.com>,
        Len Brown <lenb@...nel.org>, Mark Gross <markgross@...nel.org>,
        Jaroslav Kysela <perex@...ex.cz>,
        Takashi Iwai <tiwai@...e.com>,
        "moderated list:SOUND - SOC LAYER / DYNAMIC AUDIO POWER MANAGEM..." 
        <alsa-devel@...a-project.org>,
        ACPI Devel Maling List <linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org>,
        patches@...nsource.cirrus.com,
        Platform Driver <platform-driver-x86@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/5] ACPI / scan: Create platform device for CLSA0100

On Fri, 14 Jan 2022 19:56:04 +0100,
Hans de Goede wrote:
> 
> Hi,
> 
> On 1/14/22 18:51, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > On Fri, Jan 14, 2022 at 5:19 PM Takashi Iwai <tiwai@...e.de> wrote:
> >>
> >> On Thu, 13 Jan 2022 18:07:28 +0100,
> >> Lucas Tanure wrote:
> >>>
> >>> The ACPI device with CLSA0100 is a sound card with
> >>> multiple instances of CS35L41 connected by I2C to
> >>> the main CPU.
> >>>
> >>> We add an ID to the i2c_multi_instantiate_idsi list
> >>> to enumerate all I2C slaves correctly.
> >>>
> >>> Signed-off-by: Lucas Tanure <tanureal@...nsource.cirrus.com>
> >>
> >> I think it's better to merge this from sound git tree together with
> >> others in the patch set, presumably for rc1.
> >>
> >> It'd be great if ACPI people can take a review and give an ack/nack.
> > 
> > Hans, what do you think?
> 
> This patch (5/5) applies on top of:
> 
> https://lore.kernel.org/linux-acpi/20211210154050.3713-1-sbinding@opensource.cirrus.com/
> 
> Which still needs some work and which really should be merged
> through the ACPI tree. IMHO it would be best to simply drop
> this (5/5) from this series and move it to the v3 of the
> series which I've linked to above.
> 
> 1-4 can be merged through the alsa tree independently of 5/5 AFAIK.

OK, that's fine.

Lucas, could you submit v3 patches in the suggested way?


thanks,

Takashi

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ