linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 5.15 00/41] 5.15.15-rc1 review

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Sat, 15 Jan 2022 13:15:48 +0100
From:   Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:     Ron Economos <re@...z.net>
Cc:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, torvalds@...ux-foundation.org,
        akpm@...ux-foundation.org, linux@...ck-us.net, shuah@...nel.org,
        patches@...nelci.org, lkft-triage@...ts.linaro.org, pavel@...x.de,
        jonathanh@...dia.com, f.fainelli@...il.com, stable@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5.15 00/41] 5.15.15-rc1 review

On Sat, Jan 15, 2022 at 03:52:34AM -0800, Ron Economos wrote:
> On 1/15/22 12:14 AM, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> > On Fri, Jan 14, 2022 at 11:59:57AM -0800, Ron Economos wrote:
> > > On 1/14/22 12:16 AM, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> > > > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.15.15 release.
> > > > There are 41 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> > > > to this one.  If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> > > > let me know.
> > > > 
> > > > Responses should be made by Sun, 16 Jan 2022 08:15:33 +0000.
> > > > Anything received after that time might be too late.
> > > > 
> > > > The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
> > > > 	https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v5.x/stable-review/patch-5.15.15-rc1.gz
> > > > or in the git tree and branch at:
> > > > 	git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-5.15.y
> > > > and the diffstat can be found below.
> > > > 
> > > > thanks,
> > > > 
> > > > greg k-h
> > > Built and booted successfully on RISC-V RV64 (HiFive Unmatched).
> > > 
> > > Warnings:
> > > 
> > > fs/jffs2/xattr.c: In function 'jffs2_build_xattr_subsystem':
> > > fs/jffs2/xattr.c:887:1: warning: the frame size of 1104 bytes is larger than
> > > 1024 bytes [-Wframe-larger-than=]
> > >    887 | }
> > >        | ^
> > > lib/crypto/curve25519-hacl64.c: In function 'ladder_cmult.constprop':
> > > lib/crypto/curve25519-hacl64.c:601:1: warning: the frame size of 1040 bytes
> > > is larger than 1024 bytes [-Wframe-larger-than=]
> > >    601 | }
> > >        | ^
> > > drivers/net/wireguard/allowedips.c: In function 'root_remove_peer_lists':
> > > drivers/net/wireguard/allowedips.c:77:1: warning: the frame size of 1040
> > > bytes is larger than 1024 bytes [-Wframe-larger-than=]
> > >     77 | }
> > >        | ^
> > > drivers/net/wireguard/allowedips.c: In function 'root_free_rcu':
> > > drivers/net/wireguard/allowedips.c:64:1: warning: the frame size of 1040
> > > bytes is larger than 1024 bytes [-Wframe-larger-than=]
> > >     64 | }
> > >        | ^
> > > drivers/vhost/scsi.c: In function 'vhost_scsi_flush':
> > > drivers/vhost/scsi.c:1444:1: warning: the frame size of 1040 bytes is larger
> > > than 1024 bytes [-Wframe-larger-than=]
> > >   1444 | }
> > >        | ^
> > Are these new warnings with this release, or old ones?
> > 
> > thanks,
> > 
> > greg k-h
> 
> They are old ones.

Ok, that's good.  Are they fixed in 5.16?  Anyone planning on fixing
them given that -Werror is now allowed to be set?

thanks,

greg k-h